What's "Right"? I'll Tell You What's Left

What's "Right"?  I'll tell you what isn't, and then we will see what is in fact, and always was, Left.  Sometimes one has to take one's own long-held beliefs and perspectives to task, take the perhaps excruciating and yet liberating course of throwing dead baggage overboard, realizing that not only is it deadening, but that it always had been.  This may be taken in steps, sometimes a quantum leap of sorts in the twinkle of an "aha!" moment.

It is made all the more refreshing by sensing the palpable authenticity of having known the one perspective for so long and taken leave of it, for that which is more real, more grounded in fact, and likewise inquisitively open and flexible for further development according to actual information as it is continualy gathered and assessed. 

It is also made all the more difficult however, in a pervasive and intellectually stifling climate of political-correctness which literally dictates with emotional bludgeoning all that does not fit with the advancing extremism over the past decade into the present, representing with accelerating fervor and escalating pressure - even violence - the very Leftist ideology one had discarded and freed oneself of like a pseudo-religious sect, by merely reacquainting oneself with a clearer perspective and adjusting one's own coordinates with life and with political realities as they affect all lives, whether everyone is conscious of this fact or not.

In their book, Living With The Left (p.239), Austrian authors Lichtmesz and Sommerfeld refer to a study by an American opinion research institute, which found that "those of the Left are much more intolerant of conservatives or (even) 'moderates', than vice versa".

How often, over years where I considered myself, and identified with being, a "liberal Democrat" - with "socialist sympathies" out of a sense of obviousness which needn't be challenged or discussed, as nearly everyone in my circles of contact were more or less of this same cloth - did I sense some lack of ground.  Still it was simply "understood", a no-brainer supported by a wide echo chamber - which I'd only much later felt compelled to come to terms with being indeed that: a No-Brainer.  Two factors particularly contributed to my waking up on this, to put it in a nutshell:  the German Left, and the Clintons.

But all those years, how uncomfortable it was to be confronted with finding - or hearing from others - that it was often conservatives, yes sometimes even voting Republicans, who were most open to what the other person had to say, who were most liberal toward what other viewpoints there were to matters, who were the least racist because of not having issues about race, who had the least invested in "being right" or dominant on anything, being more likely to champion freedom of mind and opinion and speech.

What is Right is, and has always been, in various degrees across any spectrum, at its core conservative, just that.  It may even carry some quite liberal elements within itself.  (Only the Left would reject this assertion, but I'll come back to them.)  Right is by nature nationally grounded and patriotic.  This need have nothing to do with an ideological "nationalism", for as is the case with any ideology, it is known to be the death of any possibly good idea.  To be patriotic and to love one's nation and one's people, and to identify most with one's own native culture and identity, is hardly at some risk any more - at least long since not, to be honest about it - of fomenting hatred or bellicose contempt toward any neighboring or foreign state or culture.

Right is therefore not, by any necessary or honest definiton, "reactionary" or "fascist" or domineering, let alone bellicose.  With the French Revolution's radical terror as fore-runner to the wonders of Communism:  Every system which has governed over the longest periods of the 20th - and, so far I'm afraid, current - century in a characteristically totalitarian manner, whether under a specific dictator with personality-cult or a dictatorship by overweening control-freaking ideology-functionaries keeping the Machine oiled and its rule draconic, has always been and remains even now:  Socialist.  That is, of the Left, and of none other.  The Right has always been the national and conservative thinking, at best stabilizers and at worst rather stuffy.  A Holocaust is no product of the Right, and no faking the facts will ever make it so.  Hitler's was a revolution in the strongest socialist terms - not the "socialist" in NSDAP was the manipulation as we'd been taught to regard it, but the "national", for although it was that indeed, it was the red-herring of this brown-styled Socialism looking to re-invent the wheel as Socialism always does, and always at severe cost in human lives, suffering, failure.

Permanently installed Concentration and Death Camps, Gulags and Stasi-prison systems, the threat of any of these as a part of a ruling shadow of terror - all these are of the ideologically Left-totalitarian conception in subduing, controlling, coercing a populace into numb obedience.  An obedience to the raw power of Socialist tyranny.

Now, then - what is Left?  It so happens, that while the Right is by principle always the bulwark of stability, preservation of culture and values, which in a working democratic and Constitutional system should ideally provide for changes, as was originally so intended, in order to keep the system doing what it already is doing - only better - the Left by contrast is constantly concerned, even obsessively so (with a classically socialist drive for power), with Social Experimentation and "creating" The New Man.  Whereby their renowned "humanitarianism", less an expression of, than a replacement for, a grounded religious or spiritual upbringing, is alarmingly shallow and self-serving - if not also criminal in intent.

What my dear partner Rana and I in our findings and observations, and those within our contemporary circles of discussion, exchange of ideas, and public demonstration, all have known for some time - and which has just received still more precise confirmation from the Trump Administration's entirely unique source of guidance cryptically known as Q (Q-Anon) - is that, not only were "The Nazis" (that is, National-Socialists) in fact Leftists - by HItler's and by Goebbels' own public admission - of the Left, from the Left, they were entirely socialist to the marrow.  None from the Left today will even grasp this if you tell them, or if they've "heard it all before" it will be automatically rejected.  (As "propaganda" of course, which the Left itself should know best about.)

The fact is, coming to just that:  It was no one less than the CIA itself at the very onset of the post-war years, which got right to work on all the newly established press media spreading the disinformation on National-Socialism, that it had been "right-wing" when in fact it was - and they were, Hitler and Goebbels quite specifically - Leftist.  The CIA is still at it to this very day, media-control included.  The EU as Hitler had envisioned it under German rule, was effectively confiscated by the Allies and set into new planning as far back as war's end. The continued intent to sublimate or destroy German advancement and competitive dominance in peacetime affairs (this itself having already led to two world wars) still envisions a socialist re-booted EU-Soviet of sorts, now centrally run out of Brussels over and above anyone's national sovereignty, yet with Germany (which still has no soverignty of its own to even "lose"!) as the main driving engine for the whole production - making it once again further un-loved by its neighbors.  Thus Merkel.  And the Inter-Nazis.

So the real role played by the overextended Holocaust guilt-complex undeservedly driven into this generation and passed on to the next, is also in keeping the myth alive that this very Leftist mass-mechanized atrocity was ever a "right-wing fascism" indelibly stamped into every German's - and observer of Germans' - psyche as "The Nazis" without anyone giving a thought to what that "-zis" is loudly telling us.  Do you see?  (Or do you still not-see?)  If the Nazis were Left, were Socialist, that would be problematic for a very Soviet manner of EU (about just which manifestation Gorbachev himself later expressed astonished dismay), so they needed to be rendered "right-wing" fascists.  And this worked without a hitch.

They were not enemies of Communism (German or Soviet) but its competitors.  Both were brutal and both were domineeringly, draconically totalitarian in their joint but of course differently carried out determination to form The New Man, to forge the better Social Experiment and rip the future from each other's clammy blood-soaked hands.  And (real, actual) neo-Nazi fringe groups since then and today, callling themselves, or letting themselves be called, right-wing or -extreme:  they're all as full of shit as any SJW college professor or "Anti"fa-subsidizing politician in the Bundestag.  There was brown socialism and there was - and is now, as virulent as ever in its final Last Stand - red socialism.  Both hate freedom, both hate the sacredness of children, both hate what a woman really is about and what manhood is, both hate the natural sexuality which needs no gender-mindfuck to "improve" or improvise on anything, both hate real tolerance, real diversity, and both hate intellectual integrity, balanced physical and mental health, the real science and art of being Human, and honest hard reflection.

The Left we see before us today is not the classic Left of progressive thinkers - yes, there are indeed those, with all respect, but we are observing precisely these being increasingly pilloried as "Right" for contesting or contradicitng the politically-correct tyranny of the Regressive-Aggressive Left we see before us today.  In a brazen display of cowardice and sheer Groupthink, shouting us down in an attempt to drown out our words with blaring redundant content-free noise and vocal tantrums, and to bolster this manner of "argument" with bottles - sometimes Molotovs - with the cobblestones of the very streets they seek to occupy, oil/petrol mixtures or glue products to spray or toss at unsuspecting demonstrators, sitting blockades which the police won't clear, parked cars set afire, bicycle ride-by attacks or other sneaky tactics (doxxing, defamation and libel, serious vandalism of private property and psycho-terror). Murder is not yet quite their M.O., but its criminally verifiable attempt has been duly noted, reported, charged.

What do they want?  They want Hillary, they want Deep State.  They want Soros and all his NGOs, they want the NWO.  They want #OpenBorders, they want Islamisation (without admitting it exists).  They want the sheer destruction of land and limb which these are bringing, for they do not give a goddamn, they believe they will ride some kind of wave into power (over everyone else, as always with Socialism), not once grasping that they are riding ever closer to the Abyss into which they will tumble to their deaths - in this very lifetime.  They want Mao, they want Che, they want their "Revolution" now.  They want Hitler and don't even known it.  They want all this.  And they want to be known as "The Resistance".  But like every other term or claim they either fake, misname, pervert, abuse or outright destroy - this is one they will never own.  It's not they who are the Resistance - they are the System itself, with all its bile and venom and corruption and nerve-deadening, soul-consuming, child-sacrificing, photo-oping, commercialistic toxicity.  System-Dems, System-Reps - in Germany it's the whole spectrum of bloc-parties, from Merkel's CDU/CSU through the SPD, The Greens, The Left, even the normally inconsequential FDP.

And that is what's Left.  After that, there is only the AfD.

We are the Resistance.  Trump is more than "the 45th" at his Oval desk, he is the Resistance.  Here, where we take to the streets as we have for over three-and-a-half years, we - the AfD, Pegida, the Identitarian Movement, the still-unaffiliated but already fed-up citizens of more and more German cities across this Banana-Republic:  we are the Resistance.

REALITY CHECK - no kidding - once more, for the record:

If I'm seen here with a kippa, or even a modest Jewish star, for the neo-Nazis and the Muslim supremacists - I'm "a Zionist".

If I'm seen with a Federal German Republic national flag (entirely apart from soccer-mania, which no longer interests me), for the Regressive/Aggressive Left - I'm "a Nazi".

If I'm seen with either or both - by either the self-loathing "Anti"fa OR their Kufar-hostile co-antiGerman cohorts of "The-Religion-Of-Peace", for them - I'm "an Islamophobic".

Leftists (the red socialists), Islamists (the green socialists), or "Right-extremists" (the (actually-leftist) brown socialists) - all three sharing a common Jew-hatred AND a pathologically, negatively charged regard toward Germany itself or toward a healthy robust German patriotism, or toward German normality at all - I could concievably find my activist ass targeted by any one of the above.

The most likely however, is a tie between the first two, the least likely being - let it be duly noted - that third category: because one has a plethora of the first two anywhere one goes in Berlin or across Germany, particularly Westward. As for that third - who have only a marginal existence BY COMPARISON, with no power or influence on the norm, nothing they have their hands on, and no future whatsoever - I suppose I'd almost have to walk into their own livingrooms to be even noticed by them, much less "accosted".

When the ACTUAL brown-socialists, namely "The Third Way", "The Right", "Europe-Action" or even the mouldy NPD party - are even visible, the red-socialists of the "Anti"fa never EVER go there and actually try anything, or if they do, very limply and keeping a broad distance - happy that the "bastard cops" are there to keep them safe from themselves, because they KNOW they'd have their asses handed to them in a basket, possibly even get themselves killed. The ABOVE MENTIONED serious right-wing-extreme are criminally dangerous if you cross them, but irrelevant to ALL the MSM and never mentioned and never noticed (except when jacking up the "narrative" about Right-wing violence while ignoring or entirely playing down the rmapant Islamic) because THEY POSE NO DANGER to either the general society, nor to the political cadavre-System of the Merkel-Cartel, to no one in effect. The REAL DANGER to the entire establsihed Merkel Structure of power, is and remains the purely democratic, non-violent and actively patriotic face of the AfD, of Pegida, of the Identitarians, the REAL Opposition and the REAL Diversity - THIS, and no "neoNazi" is "THE THREAT" to the monopoly on power and its propaganda through the officially-sycophantic, trained and brainwashed Media which serves it and is its beneficiary.

Likewise can be said for the Berlin Jewish Community and the Central Council of Jews here, they are as cozy with Merkel as Herod was to Caesar, and their regard toward Germany is AS SUSPECT to me as is their genuine interest in the well-being of their own Jews here. I am on their shit-list as well. They have in their league still active ex-Stasis and other informants and traitors of Jewish background (in name only) who do not take kindly to Jews who publicly - and unmistakeably - speak up FOR the patriots and march with them on the streets of German cities.  (It disturbs their "narrative".)

We who are openly, identifiably, unabashedly - and UNBASHABLE - Jewish, such as myself and a couple German citizens I could mention, such as two sturdy Israelis I could mention as well, with whom I have demonstrated for German patriotic issues of present and urgent import.

THAT'S the difference between actual REALITY and the die-hard conception of Germany and Germans which still prevails and circulates.

 

The Leftist sympathizers of the Islamisation WILL HANG by the very hands of those for whom they'd sold-out their own country and culture - as they have been doing all this time: as had happened in Lebanon and in Iran, as is coming to the UK, as I've often loudly and clearly warned the "Anti"fa in Berlin, and as I have fully given up warning my fellow Americans. I'm done, let 'em hang.

(More Than "Just" Cultural) MARXISM UNVEILED

 

On the occasion of Karl Marx's 200th birthday 2018, a characteristically hyped affair in Left-driven Germany, an enormous socialist-godsized statue depicting the Father of Communism (a gift graciously bestowed by none less than the Chinese government) had been ceremoniously and with much celebration unveiled in West-German Trier, his birthplace.

This last Monday I had a group of our currenty usual mix of Bärgida (Berlin's Pegida) - and others who'd attached themselves to our now well over three year long unbroken weekly endeavor, amounting to just over fifty of us - before me at the end of our Demo-Walk, as I began my reading aloud, mike in hand, at a pleasant square with a fountain, of a choice article outlining a little known work of Marx concerning "The Jewish Question", graphically illustrating with generous quotes form his own text, Marx's explicit antisemitism, his intensely relished (and quite ignored by his admirers) anti-Jewish prose, and his pretty base contempt and enmity toward his contemporary Jewish socialist "competitors" and "capitalists" alike. I threw in for good measure, my dear friend (and contributing researcher) Michael Kleemann's passages concerning the close relationship between this work and HItler's and Goebbel's insistance (with sourced quotes) that the NSDAP was Leftist. Mention was given also to the fact that the German Communist Party of the 1920's had introduced exactly these passages into its "Red Flag" publication, which were then passed along later to the National-Socialist agenda.

Across the police cordon, always there to protect our physical safety from the Marxist-Wannabes for Peace and Tolerance, there about that lovely fountain, were gathered some well over fifty (hard to tell) "Anti"fa with the usual flag waving and loud whistles and tooters, ghetto-blaster blaring, and hysterical screaming and shouting ("Nazis out!" of course). I was less addressing my reading to our group specifically, and far moreso the "Anti"fa themselves, so it was fitting that they should be there and hear this. They didn't, of course, they never do.

I thundered the text loudly and clearly, as one is compelled to under such circumstances, and they thundered back all the louder but altogether unclearly. It isn't about what they "agree" or "disagree" with, it is as always about being paid (literally subsidized) to bellow and drown out. Sort of like Berkley, and just as prone to violence - hence our police, who did listen.

The text was of course in German, so I'm not translating the article here, but I'd posted it already. But I'll mention the few spontaneous comments of my own which I did throw in - for good measure - for both the core group of this screaming mob of Left-extremists and moralizing terrorists, and for any marginally "right-wing" listeners who for whatever reason also don't like hearing this from a Jew.

I pointed out, mincing no words (I never do, with either of them), that I was about to give them a more intimate taste of their own icon Marx - "not Groucho Marx, not the NWO-Cardinal Marx, not the old Deutschmarks, but Karl, you know: Karl. Marx. That Marx!" They were in high form, and so was I.

I told them after the article was through (they're like the old Gary Larson cartoon depicting what we say to our dogs and what they actually understand - the latter being, "bla bla bla Trixy, bla bla bla Trixy, bla bla...!), during which they'd only heard "Marx" and "Hitler" and "Jews", if I'm to go by their own Tweets as someone showed me later, pointedly what I do NOT concern myself with here:

That "...I DON'T concern myself with any thoughts of being physically attacked by or in danger on account of" the ACTUAL existing, real neo-Nazi elements, each of which I mentioned by name, including the insignificant NPD party, to drive home the point that AfD is NOT on this list, far far from it. I firmly countered their very staged rage with the fact that these "Neos" are likewise just socialists and always were, but these have no power and no pull, are of entirely negligible influence on any part of the mainstream German population. And that these also "never will, NOR would they ever have their act so together as to build a Concentration Camp, or erect a Gulag, or for that matter a (GDR-Stasi) Bautzen-Prison. The totalitarian Socialist Left however, most certainly and most definitely would, and will again - if they're not stopped NOW from taking Germany in the direction it's headed for a third goddamned time, under this very Regime!" They're programmed zombies, or on drugs, or just reality-challenged on their own - or all three.

But hear it or not, it needed to be said, and it was an affront for anyone from their crowd or from any Neos-courting groupies. Raising my voice a titch more over their din, and speaking in measured phrases so that my message would go unmistakeably on record, I cut to the chase: "The reason why I will NOT be attacked, as a Jew in this country by anyone from the 'radical right Neos', is simple: because I am a Patriot."

Then giving them a taste of their own bile I tossed in, "So F*** Marx, F*** Socialism, and F*** You 'Anti'fa!" And left it at that. They should take it home with them when they crawl back to their mothers' basements.

I left them with some real Marx, and - deaf and brain-dead notwithstanding - I left some marks, just for the record. There is no love lost between me and the Left, me and the "far-right" or Neos, nor between me and the System-Jews of the Central Committee which likewise panders to Merkel and to mainstream appeasement and instrumentalisation.

This is a struggle over life and death - the fields of battle ar ethe parliaments, the media, the net, and the streets. We have to apply our minds and our intestinal fortitude, before it ever comes to civil war. And should it do that, we will be there as well.

Here is the original article from which I read: https://www.facebook.com/notes/sam-inayat-chisti/aus-junge-freiheit-der-ausgeblendeter-antisemitismus/10156473485749114/

And here is the complete address in Living Color, as delivered on the above described evening in May 2018:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41J5JB7ABF0

 

 

 

Gaslighting The Public With Impunity

This gives you EXACTLY what the Merkwellian State of Germany-under-Merkel is, in reality. This is it, 100%. While the intent of the 8 min. clip is to explain how individuals gaslight other individuals, it applies - all "twenty signs" - as I've frequently pointed out before (see below), to Merkel's own character, to the character of her far-Left State apparatus and its agencies, and to the climate reflected through and generated by the entire spectrum of a mainstream System-conformist, Merkel-loyal press and television.

All criticism and dissent on the part of liberal-conservative voices, from the most professional to the commenting public - in print, on the webs, have been increasingly maligned, discredited, shut down and blacklisted, intimidated or bludgeoned, until many do not even trust themselves to think to themselves in dissent, much less speak it out.

One most recent case in point, of gaslighting: the de-toothed Bavarian state minister (CSU) whom Merkel just appointed to Federal Interior, her former critic Seehofer - now a shell of what he'd once been - announcing in what amounts to more than a sleight of hand, rather a completely transparent lie (and this with impunity), that the German public is "safer than it ever has been since the Reunification" in regard to attacks and to criminal statistics, and that "German citizens have simply no cause for concern about their security".

That: a) many still buy this because only watching state television, and b) an ever growing number of (a) are onto the scam but far too intimidated to speak openly, and c) are constantly fed mixed-propaganda concerning the multiple issues themselves and concerning those of us on the streets (Pegida, for example) or in legislature (AfD) who doggedly address those issues, and d) the coddling and financing of "Anti"fa thug-mobs and Left-extremism in general - taking all of this into acccount, one gets an idea how the short clip below also delivers on the reality of Germany since Merkel took (abuse of) Office 13 years ago:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6X5JncWXMo0

HERE'S one for "Gaslighting": What you see here really ARE of the verifiably bona fide NEO-NAZI Right-extremist elements, in Germany as in much of EUrope. THAT SAID, it is imperative to know the following - and I am not "gaslighting" you on this - Merkel & Co. however, indeed ARE:

1) Their names are "Third Way", or "Action Europe" or "The Right"- and they have no power - as their only political embodiment (the NPD party) hasn't attained much if any legislative ground in decades and never will, they've no influence of any consequence, are of negligible size with no future. How do I know that? Read on.

2) Being what they themselves ARE telling us they are - National-Socialist (just separating that into two words to avoid arrest) - they are exactly as Socialist in their thinking, and this includes the NPD party, as the Socialists themselves - which really makes them Left, as Hitler and Goebbels had stated in their time that they were.

3) What these below AREN'T, is: they are NOT even the ones targeted, in the Merkel.State's bogus and staged "Fight-Against-Rightwingers", in fact these all remain untouched by any state actions against their very existence - should the "Anti"fa even show up, it will be held back by the police and come to nothing of mention, but I'll return to that shortly.

4) The ONLY OPPOSITION to the Merkel-State, and the ONLY liberal-conservative ACTIVISM which the State and all of its Left garnered forces (Greens, Left party, SPD, Stasi agencies, "Anti"fa, the Press) DO go after, and this with a vengeance: is to be found in the steadily stronger and imminently democratic Alternative for Germany (AfD) party, or specifically civil initiatives such as Pegida or Identitarians which have also grown to Movement proportions extending throughout Europe and beyond. These are loathed and despised by BOTH the Merkel contingencies on the Left AND the Neo-Nazi Scene as the video depicts - BECAUSE the Merkel-State really DOES share this in common with the Left- and Right-Extremists, this State with its over-hyped program of "Fight-Against-Rightwingers" (nearly 100 million Euro allotted this year for that, vs. 0.6 million Euro for any "Fight-Against-Left-Extremism"!) really DOESN'T lay a finger on the Neo-Nazis and their ilk. ONLY on the Patriotic Democratic elements which REALLY pose a threat to the Merkwellian System.

 

5) Flags: You see NO Federal German flags in the video below, and you never will. Only their own crap. Needless to say, one of the reasons THEY openly and vocally hate us (i.e., the AfD, Pegida in any city, Bärgida in Berlin, the Identitarians) is that we have no qualms about an Israeli flag openly waving next to the German Federal, we are not ideologically anti.Israel - neither AfD nor Pegida, on the contrary - and I, yours truly, may at any time show up with a Kippa. WE are constantly, ceaselessly screamed down and called "Nazis" and "fascists" and "right-extremists" for being patriots and taking a position for direct democracy and restoration of Constitutional law - whether so attacked on the streets or in the press or in the Bundestag. WE are called "antisemites" and "racists" and "brown" - WHEREAS the Leftist ringleaders and their "Anti"fa stand shoulder to shoulder with Hamas in burning Israeli flags, and THEN stand around with the System-Jews-for-Merkel wearing "solidarity"-Kippas, all the while flipping out if I or WE should carry an Israeli flag at our demos - I could show you another clip where Neo-Nazis (such as seen below) are lightly confronted by protesting, normally anti-Israel "Anti"fa WITH: an Israeli flag! But when I carry one, I'm a "Nazi".  In the city of Fürth, so insane has all this become, Pegida - which has always filtered out any Neos, attracted to its numbers, out of its demos - has been suddenly prohibited from displaying the Israeli flag (a regular staple since well over three years now) out of concern for "offending the Left"!  And then they continue to slander and libel us "Nazis" in the same breath, without missing a beat.

6) This manner of constant smoke and mirrors, gaslighting, mis- and disinformation, playing sides off one another and distorting all perceptions of reality, is part and parcel of the Merkel Regime and all of its tactics - after all, she IS the very embodiment and Trojan Mare of the socialist-totalitarian GDR which had spawned her in the first place - who violates the Constitution in actual pracitce, far more dangerously than these Neos ever do in spirit.

7) So once again: Yes, there is a core-grouping of hard-line Neo-Nazis made-to-order - but they are "marching" on orders from Merkel's own agencies, which is WHY they are left untouched. WHEREAS: all the so-called and mis-named "Neos" and "Right-extremists" about which YOU are apt to being told in reporting (as is likewise the docile, gullible German populace) like ourselves, namely the AfD, Pegida, Bärgida, the Identitarians, are simply and matter-of-factly mixed classic-liberals and classic-conservatives who are asserting a healthy and robust patriotism and demand for democratic rule of law. The video below gives you a tate of Merkel's Permitted Neos - who not only fit the cliché, they live it, but only in their little corners, ingored or overlooked by the Left's Dogs of Denunciation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BG2eLULotVw

http://samuelinayatchisti.blogspot.de/2017/12/merkels-gaslighting.html

http://samuelinayatchisti.blogspot.de/2018/04/more-gaslighting-more-gaslighting-keep.html

http://samuelinayatchisti.blogspot.de/2018/04/left-left-left-right-left.html

Nachruf des wohl unwahrscheinlichste Freundes

Nachruf von einem aufgeklärten SS-Offizier von Auschwitz - und unsere einmalige Korrespondenz

*10.06.1921          +09.03.2018

 

Am 9. März 2018 ist ein Mann gestorben, dessen freundliche Bekanntschaft ich vor 13 Jahren machte. Erst und allein, Anlaß dieses, gebe ich in der Öffentlichkeit einen äußerst persönlichen Austausch.

Im Januar 2005, als ich eine „Bild“ Zeitung von einem Patientenzimmer entsorgen wollte, warf ich flüchtig wie gewohnt einen Blick auf die vordere Seite – und stand stock still: da las ich im Großdrück: „Soll bloß keiner sagen, er hätte nichts gewußt – ICH WAR SS-MANN IN AUSCHWITZ“– und unter sein Bild von damals, im Uniform bei der Verwaltung, war der hier im Interview im Alter von 83 Jahren: Hr. Oskar Gröning.

Ich las sofort mit Erstaunen, wie er erzählte, klar und authentisch, sein Leben und seine Reue – und noch interessanter, seine Entschlossenheit, offen darüber zu Reden, gegen Leugner auszusagen und über die Mordrufe, Mordbriefe und öffentlichen Druck durch Altnazi-Verbände, verklärten NS-Verehrer und wahren rechts-radikale Verleugner. Er wünschte sich, einmal in seinem Leben, einen Juden vor sich nochmal zu sehen und um Vergebung oder Verzeihung zu bitten, dem die Hand zu reichen. Ich glaube ich weinte. Ich hatte, wie oft bei mir, viel dazu zu sagen, und zwar unmittelbar und ausschließlich zu ihm selbst.

Am selben Tag, schrieb ich an ihn meinen Brief, rief „Bild“ an, erklärte was, worum und warum ich an die Redaktionsadresse schicke, bekam deren voller Einverständnis, den Brief an ihn weiterzuleiten.

Und ich schrieb, in etwa zwei handschriftlichlen Seiten, ein Bißchen über mich – Ami, Jude, '88-'94 in Berlin stationiert gewesen, etc., und daß ich jahrzehntenlang mit der NS und Holocaust beschäftigt sei und wie dringend wichtig für mich die Entlastung nach der Aufklärung der Nachkriegsgenerationen sei. Ich erzählte wie sein Interview auf mich wirkte. Ich sagte ihm buchstäblich: daß ich den Tag niemals befürchtete, wie ich reagiere, wenn ein Altnazi vor mir steht, mich um „Verzeihung“ bitten soll – da ein Nazi eh keine Reue kennt, und das steht fest. Bis auf Oskar Gröning, bis auf heute, bis auf je.

Ich schrieb: „Sie sind vielleicht der Nazi auf den ich über 16 Jahre gewartet habe!“ Ich machte ihm klar, wie beeindrückt ich war, wie authentisch ich ihn fand – und daß, obwohl es stünde mir gar nicht zu, ihn zu Vergeben noch zu verzeihen, da ich kein Opfer sei und auch keine Familie dabei verloren habe – gerade indem aber, liege es in meiner Kraft und meiner Verantwortung, mit ihm mein Verständnis und mein Beistand zu teilen, die Hand zu reichen, mein Schulter zu geben, so authentisch eine Stellungnahme wie seine Eigene.

Wobei ich normalerweise einen ausgehenden Brief fotokopiere, dieses mal nicht, ich erwartete nichts weiter und wollte ihn möglichst schnell zur Post bringen, da mit ca. 85 und so belastet, er sollte noch leben um meine Zeilen zum Lesen zu bekommen.

Ich habe mal viele Leute in Positionen geschrieben, bekam mal Antworten – von meiner einen Kopie, von denen jeweiligen das Original, beide von mir behalten, alles noch zu Hause – habe mal den Papst geschrieben, bekam Antwort, mal Weizsäcker – bekam nach einer Woche Antwort. Kurze Zeit nach dieser Absendung bekam ich Antwort von Oskar Gröning. Das Original, mit Umschlag, habe ich.

Also, hier sein Text, vom 15.3.2005, Buchstäblich gegeben – inklusiv zusätzlich handgeschriebene Äußerungen:

(von) Oskar Gröning

Lieber Herr Inayat-Chisti!   (erst in Druck, wie der Brief selbst, dann durchgestrichen und handschriftlich wiederholt)

Über die Redaktion der Bildzeitung Abteilung Politik erhielte ich Ihr Schreiben vom 6. Februar d. Jhr. Ich darf Ihnen danken fuer Ihre Zeilen, da sie sich doch deutlich abheben von den Inhalten anderer Briefe, die ich in den letzten zwanzig Jahren zu diesem Thema erhielt. Es war nicht immer erfreulich!

Ich bin nämlich mit meinen Aussagen im Bild-Interview zwar zum erstenmal in die Öffentlichkeit gegangen, aber habe im Jahre 1985 einen unangenehmen Kontakt mit Neo-Nazis gehabt. Ein Gesprächspartner während einer Versammlung zweifelte an der Wahrheit des Holocaust und gab mir zum Beweis eine Broschüre „Die Auschwitzlüge“ von einem deutsch-Dänen Christophersen. Ich las zuhause die Broschüre und gab sie dem Mann wieder zurück, indem ich – ohne Datum, Unterschrift etc. – Glossen über diese Pamphlet Seite für Seite schriftlich niederschrieb. Er sollte daraus lernen. – Wochen später erfuhr ich, dass dieser Mann dem Autor (Christophersen) diese Kommentar als „Leserbrief“ von mir zugeschickt hatte, die der dann wiederum in seiner NeoNazi-Monatschrift „Die Bauernschaft“ mit meiner Telefonnummer versehen, veröffentlichte. Ich hatte dann Telefon-terror über Wochen. Das war Öffentlichkeit genug. – Außerdem musste ich dreimal als Zeuge vor Landgerichten erscheinen, um Zeugnis über Auschwitz zu geben. Auch das war nicht leicht.

Zu meiner Person: Ich bin (als Jahrgang 1921) aufgewachsen in einem Elternhaus, das national (nicht nationalsozialistisch) ausgerichtet war. Mein Vater war Teilnehmer des ersten Weltkriegs und ist 1915 schwer verwundet. Er verlor ein Auge durch einen Handgrenatensplitter. Unserer Familie (Mutter ist im Jahre 1924 verstorben, ich hatte noch einen Bruder, der in Russland (Stalingrad) im Alter von 22 Jahren tödlich verwundet wurde) war nicht vermögend und so hatte ich eine Jugend – zwar mit guter Ausbildung (Banklehre) – die nicht rosig war. Als 1933 Hitler an die Macht kam, waren als erstes die damals fünf Millionen Arbeitslosen von der Strasse. Er gab ihnen Arbeit (in einem Arbeitsdienst für Straßenbau und Moorkultivierung), das machte Eindruck. Auch die anderen Maßnahmen wurden von der Bevölkerung gut aufgenommen, denn Arbeit, Brot und ein wenig Geld zu haben ist für die Stimmung im Volke immer gut.

Schlecht war nur, dass Hitler Leute, die gegen ihn waren, einfach einsperrte (KZ). Wir wüssten nicht, wohin das führen würde! In der „Hitlerjugend“ wanderten wir, sangen Lieder und feierten am Lagerfeuer. Wir konnten für ein wenig Geld durch ganz Deutschland wandern oder mit dem Fahrrad fahren. Übernachtung für 35 Pfennig in einer Jugendherberge. Es war eine schöne Zeit für uns. Als dann der Krieg kam (es wurde uns erzählt, dass die Bösen diesen Krieg begannen, weil sie neidisch waren) waren wir bereit das Erreichte zu verteidigen. Mit der Waffe in der Hand. So kam ich begeistert in die Waffen-SS, denn das war eine Elitetruppe (gleich den „Ledernacken“ in den USA). Wer wollte nicht dabei sein?! – Und eines Tages bekam ich einen Befehl (an die Front in Russland?), nein. Ich fand mich eines morgens im Oktober 1942 in Auschwitz wieder. Das ist meine Geschichte dahin – Sie werden fragen, ob wir uns nicht gegen die KZ's und die Synagogenbrände aufgelehnt hätten? Die Juden waren (Das Weltjudentum!) in unserer Erziehung die Bösen, die den 1. Weltkrieg angezettelt hatten, den Versailler-Vertrag mit Hunger und Arbeitslosigkeit verschuldet hatten usw. Daß in einer Kleinstadt an der Weser die Schändung einer Synagoge kein großes Aufsehen erregte, war Folge der Erziehung, in der alles deutsche gut und alles ausländische schlecht war. (Es gab ja noch keinen Rundfunk, kein Fernsehen, und nur Zeitungen, die alle überein von Hitler (Goebbels) gesteuert waren. Wo sollten wir wohl die Wahrheit her wissen?)

Ich bin so in Auschwitz erst aus meinen Jugendträumen erwacht und habe angefangen kritisch zu denken.

Lieber Herr Inayat-Chisti, haben Sie Dank für Ihren Brief. Der Inhalt hat mich seelisch so berührt, dass ich beim ersten lesen geweint habe. Wie kann ich Verständnis und sogar Beistand finden bei einem Menschen, dessen Volk so grausam verfolgt wurde, wie ich es erlebt habe. Ich habe mir immer vorgestellt, eines Tages einem Bürger Ihres Volkes die Hand geben zu können. Ohne Worte, nur so als Geste. Mit Ihrem Brief ist das wahr geworden, was ich mir gewünscht habe. Haben Sie Dank, großen Dank dafür!

Mich quält der Gedanke, Verzeihung zu finden sehr. Ich bin zu dem Schluß gekommen, dass letztlich nur unser Herrgott mir meine Reue abnehmen kann und Verzeihung und Vergebung erteilen kann. Trotzdem ist es tröstlich, zu wissen, dass man mit seinen Gedanken und Gefühlen nicht allein ist. Daß jemand, der sich bekannt macht, kommt und einem sagt: ich glaube Dir und bin bereit, Dir die Hand zu reichen. Ich bin ja nicht schuldig im Sinne eines begangenen Verbrechens und trotzdem bin ich in Schuld oder bin schuldig geworden durch andere, die mich verführten und mich so teilhaben lassen an der Schuld gegen ein Volk, gegen Menschen, gegen Frauen und Kinder.

Lieber Herr Inayat-Chisti! Sie strecken mir Ihre Hand entgegen und beten mit mir zusammen bei der Bitte um Vergebung. Sie nehmen meine Hand und trösten mich, indem Sie für sich, mir verzeihen. Für andere Personen Ihres Volkes können Sie ja nicht sprechen. Es ist trotzdem gut zu wissen, dass es einen Menschen auf der Welt gibt, der mir in meinen Gedanken beisteht und das, obwohl er Jude ist.

Vor mir liegt noch eine schwierige Zeit. Ich habe vor zwei Jahren einem Berliner Historiker gestattet, mich zu besuchen und mir Fragen über den Holocaust zu stellen. Es stellte sich heraus, daß er im Auftrage der britischen BBC handelte, die eine Dokumentation anderer Art über den Holocaust drehen wollte. Sie suchten Zeit- und Augenzeugen, deren es ja mit fortschreitender Zeit immer wenig gibt.

Mir ist ein Anliegen, gegen die Leugner des Holocaust, deren es als Verführte der NeoNazis immer mehr gibt, vorzugehen. Aus diesem Grunde habe ich mich zur Verfügung gestellt, die Wahrheit vor laufender Kamera zu sagen. Ungeschminkt, so grausam wie es wirklich war. Die Dreharbeiten sind im Jahr 2004 abgeschlossen worden. Der Film in sechs Teilen läuft zur Zeit in Großbritannien, in Frankreich und in den USA.

Das war auch Anlaß zu meinem Interview in der „Bild“. Zu Beginn der Serien-Ausstrahlung bei „BBC two“ in England wurde im „Guardian“ und „Daily Express“ über drei Seiten von mir berichtet. Da man mich aber nicht gewarnt hatte, dass die Veröffentlichungen für mich in Deutschland Folgen haben könnte, rannten mir Zeitungsreporter „die Bude ein“, um ein Interview zu bekommen. (In Deutschland wird diese Serie vermutlcih im April/Mai gesendet!) Nach Ansprache mit der BBC habe ich mich dann entschieden „Bild“ ein(!) Interview zu geben, weil man mit diesem Radaublatt die NeoNazis erreicht. Insofern war es richtig die Stellungnahme gegen die Leugner, so zu platzieren. Inzwischen habe ich Interview-Angebote aus ganz Deutscland und Uropa. Ich habe aber nur einmal grundsätzlich berichtet und stehe dazu. Ich will jedoch nicht wie ein Zirkus-Affe herumgereicht und „berühmt werden“. Aus grundsätzlichen Erwägungen gilt das auch für die vielen schriftliche Anfragen. Es wird einfach zuviel!

Lieber Herr Inayat-Chisti, es war und ist für mich sehr wichtig, Ihren Brief bekommen zu haben. Das hat die Redaktion von „Bild“ erkannt und deshalb gerade Ihren Brief an mich weitergereicht. Ich verbeuge mich vor Ihrem Angebot, mir Beistand zu leisten. Das klingt so ehrlich, wie ich auch berichtet habe. Trotzdem kann ich alter Mann, der noch höchstens zehn Zeilen Schrift ohne Zittern hinbekommt, seinem selbst empfundenen Drang, mit Ihnen in Kontakt zu bleiben, nicht erfüllen. Ihr Brief wird aber nicht im Papierkorb landen, sondern von mir aufbewahrt werden. Ich werde ihn immer wieder lesen! Vor allem dann, wenn es mir schlecht gehen sollte. Ich werde ihn auch meinen Kinder zeigen (Ich nehme an, daß ich das darf?) Sie sind auch schon 60 und 55 Jahre alt.

(Der Rest ist rein handschriftlich geschrieben):

Lassen Sie sich von uns umarmen in Herzlichkeit. Ich freue mich, mit Ihnen in Kontakt gewesen zu sein. Ihr Brief ist mir mehr Wert als viele Lobreden. Ich drücke Sie ganz fest an mein Herz und bin

Ihr Oskar Gröning

****************

 

Im April 2015 wurde er nochmal in seinem Leben, jetzt mit knapp 95 Jahren, in der neuen – jetzt ausgerechnet Merkelsch'n-und-Maas – „Auschwitz-Prozess“ gezogen, wo er zu vier Jahren Haft verurteilt wurde. Während diesem Prozess habe ich – jetzt mit meiner Ramona dazu – Ami und Jude, auch meinen Schreibfreund nicht im Stich gelassen, wir schrieben ihm gemeinsam, zwei Briefe durch seinen Rechtsanwalt an ihn geschickt, mit meiner, zwar mit unserer, Unterstützung – nicht als NS-Verehrer sondern als Privatpaar: ein Jude und eine Berlinerin deren Großeltern aktiv bei dem Widerstand waren und selbst mehr geopfert hatten als all die Verleugner von heute, und all die rot-grünen Linken und deren "Anti"fa, die Eier dazu jemals hätten.

(An ihm überhaupt ein „Kollektivschuld“ zum Mord zu hängen und dafür zu verurteilen, ist eine Zumutung des Justizinstanz eines Rechtsstaates, und ein Absurdum. In allen frühereren Prozeßen zu Auschwitz, oder anderen KZs – bzw. Todeslager – Angelegenheiten, wurde immer individuellen Schuld und dessen Folgen angesprochen, gehandelt und verurteilt. Es spricht viel über den Merkelstaat, mit Maas als Bundesjustizminister dazu, und die Förderung von Stasi-Mitarbeiter unter (selbst ehemaliger IM) Merkel, daß nichts mehr läuft nach Grundgesetz. Deren rot-grün kommunistischen Eifer führt dazu, alles in einem Topf zu werfen, bevor die „letzte Chance“ deren selbstdarstellende „Kampf-gegen-Nazis“ denen entkommt. Eine reine Links-Instrumentalisierung von heute.

Außderdem, gerade unter Merkel und ihren rot-grüne Klima der Meinungsdiktatur stellt sich einen massenhaften, gut funktionierenden Mitläufertum fest. Was bedeutet: Man hat so wenig die Eier, den Mut, heute sich gegen eine dritte deutsch-sozialistische Diktatur zu bewegen, wie damals am Ende der Weimarerzeit gegen die brauen Sozis oder gegen die roten Sozis. Denn heute sehen wir vor uns einen „vierten-Reich-Geist“ deutlich von Links.)

(Eva Mozes Kor, eine von den nebenklagenden Überlebenden, sprach selbst von ihrer Bereitschaft, ihn als Mensch zu betrachten, und ihm während dem Prozeß vergeben:  „aber ich habe ihn nicht von seiner Verantwortung befreit. Die muss er übernehmen.“)

 

Unter seinen aktuellen – gesundheitlichen und rechtlichen – Umstände, wäre kein weiteres Wort von ihm zu erwarten, und so war es geblieben – er hat wohl unsere Briefe, dank seines Anwalts, erhalten. Und jut issit.

https://kurier.at/leben/interview-holocaust-ueberlebende-eva-mozes-kor-hat-ihren-peinigern-vergeben/232.590.367

Als Beobachter war auch ein notorisch gefeierter Holocaust-Leugner anwesend, eine 89 Jahre alte Frau namens Haverbeck, die vor der Kanera gefragt wurde, was sie von seiner Aussage halte. "Nun", antwortete sie mit einem zynischen Schmunzeln, "er ist ein alter Mann, sein Gedächtnis versagt ihm." Als er kurz danach von einem Reporter angesprochen und von ihrem Kommentar erzählt wurde, blickte Hr. Gröning über seine Schulter mit einem ermüdeten Gesichtsausdruck und einem Kopfschütteln und antwortete lediglich: "Manchen kann man nicht helfen." Weder die Haverbecks noch die sog. Social-Justice-Warriors.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSTGr4eJ98w&feature=youtu.be

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3j88O64Fp24&feature=youtu.be
http://samuelinayatchisti.blogspot.de/2018/03/obituary-for-most-unlikely-of-friends.html