A History of the Relations Between...

A History of the Relations Between:

 

Israel (which the Qur’an specifically recognizes as sovereign Jewish domain in its very text)
and Palestine (which domain or any people of this name, the Qur’an never once mentions).

Pre-State: (OMG) Arab Muslims exert violence toward Jews, receiving them with war on forming a state! Socialist governments are okay with this.

Pre-“Occupation”: (OMG) Muslim states take hostile stance toward Jews and threaten war! Socialist governments are okay with this, UN stands by – just not by Israel.

Post-“Occupation”: (OMG) Muslim states take hostile stance toward Jews and threaten war…again! Socialist governments are okay with this, UN stands by – just not by Israel.
Jerusalem officially declared Israeli capital and recognized as such by the current American President: (OMG) The entire Muslim world community takes hostile stance toward Jews and threatens war…again! Socialist governments are okay with this, UN stands by – just not by Israel.

(…Didja ever hear that one, it goes: The more things change, the more they stay the same?)

"Occupation" and pre-"Occupation suggest an odd word-irony: because Islam has always been preoccupied with occupying and dominating the world, the Shari'a-terrorist Hamas states in its own Charta the intent to to the same with the now-and-still existing Israeli state - and with the Jews altogether.



Bush I: “Don’t do Jerusalem, don’t push the Muslim Umma on this.”
Clinton: “Don’t do Jerusalem, don’t push the Muslim Umma on this.”
Bush II: “Don’t do Jerusalem, don’t push the Muslim Umma on this.”
Obama – with the other Clinton in tow: “Don’t do Jerusalem, don’t push the Muslim Umma on this.”

Trump, whom the Chinese regard as Donald the Strong and Uncle Trump (while they chuckled at Trudeau and sent him packing) – Trump (peace and blessings be upon him) with less than one full year in Office: “…’Gordian Knot’?...What knot?”…CUT!

 

Y’know…you draw the line in the sand with your foot. The Muslim world swears its primitive revenge. You’re not pushing THEM – you already took THIS for granted. (That’s where the Fake-media keeps getting it altogether wrong, being fake). You address the NON-Muslim West, by drawing that line. You provoke THEM on what THEY are finally going to do about it. You’re not putting the Israelis or Hamas or Fateh to the test, you’re not putting the Muslim world to the test. You’re putting the NON-Muslim world to the test, calling THEM out, putting THEM on the line.

OKAY – Now ONE Question, to wrap this up with:
“Land return” to the Arabs who began calling themselves “Palestinians” (as an ethno-political entity) in 1967? Fine, let’s just suppose…

And suppose the Arabs-by-origin, i.e., Islam at its specifically and dramatically Arab roots, suppose these return ALL the countries and land and heritage which they conquered by brutal force and maintained – where they could – by cultural and ideological dominance spanning exactly 14 centuries, identities they’d stolen and buried or appropriated and “Islamized”, indigent ethnicities they’d mixed and Arabized, and histories they’d whitewashed. I suppose that would still cover large swaths of the Middle-East (think of the Levant, or Egypt to Morocco), North and Central Africa (think of Sudan, Nigeria), Indo-Pakistan, Afganistan, Persia, Turkey (Asia Minor) and the Caucasus (e.g., Chechenya), Indonesia, sections of S.E. Asia. Just, y’know, return it all – leave and go home: which is (now Wahhabbist Saudi) Arabia and nowhere else. Home.

Deal?...That might be an Enrichment we could all "learn from".

And Europe would not have to suffer the indignities of its THIRD Islamic Occupation in history. Then Europe could turn to its own traitors in this regard, and start legally dealing with them.