Which part of “We will strike terror in their hearts”, or “We will come, conquer you Europeans, take your women, repopulate there, subjugate you…” did you NOT understand?
And what does one do with teddy bears, votive candles and bouquets, when mass denial is in progress anyway and trust of elected and never-elected officials only numbs the will to action? What is meant today, by “getting on with our way of life,” which way of life is meant every time they take the stage and assume the right to say that?
Is it that of hyper-indoctrination in lopsided “tolerance” and “all are
diverse AND the same”, of spineless permissiveness and hedonism played
out on stage, exposing children’s psyches unprotected by parents who
themselves have issues with finding their adultness and what role
modelling and guidelines entail? Is it about exposing their own young
children to early sexualisation on a penetratingly graphic and intense
level via the music industry which gives them just such “artists” as
were heading the evening in Manchester, and via the trending
gender-madness and an agenda of set-no-limits-offer-no-guidance which
prepares them to be little tarts for the pedophile networks, websites,
societies?
Or was it some other “way of life” or lifestyle playing into the hands of West-hating jihadis and the child-trafficking industry?
Which part have you still not gotten, what part of “Appeasement is weakness inviting aggression” are you not grasping? And that, if you haven’t the character (or convention had re-educated and trained it out of you) to DEFEND YOUR OWN CHILDREN from predation by the sex, rap and (what passes for) music performance industry, and the elite in general (who will decidedly NOT defend your children) – HOW would you ever DEFEND THEM AGAINST OPEN TERROR?!
Which part of Theresa May’s lies have you still not gotten, when she, like Merkel, speaks of security?
No, Manchester is not united over this, not united “behind something” other than more conformity. If Manchester REALLY were united, if it were REALLY to unite now, they’d ALL be behind BRITAIN FIRST instead of slamming them and then trusting traitors who decidedly do NOT have you or your children’s interests in mind.
Are you getting this yet?
Or was it some other “way of life” or lifestyle playing into the hands of West-hating jihadis and the child-trafficking industry?
Which part have you still not gotten, what part of “Appeasement is weakness inviting aggression” are you not grasping? And that, if you haven’t the character (or convention had re-educated and trained it out of you) to DEFEND YOUR OWN CHILDREN from predation by the sex, rap and (what passes for) music performance industry, and the elite in general (who will decidedly NOT defend your children) – HOW would you ever DEFEND THEM AGAINST OPEN TERROR?!
Which part of Theresa May’s lies have you still not gotten, when she, like Merkel, speaks of security?
No, Manchester is not united over this, not united “behind something” other than more conformity. If Manchester REALLY were united, if it were REALLY to unite now, they’d ALL be behind BRITAIN FIRST instead of slamming them and then trusting traitors who decidedly do NOT have you or your children’s interests in mind.
Are you getting this yet?
