Showing posts with label gay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gay. Show all posts
Tuesday, November 17, 2015
LGBT/QA
To the Lost Generation of “Tolerance”-Battering/Questions and Answers:
I guess I’m “white” - ‘sthat not alright?
I’m so sorry I’m male - should I now “go to hell”?
I’m afraid I’m all hetero - ‘sthat now a no-go?
I have a motherly, and surely fatherly, aspect - I suppose this makes me patriarchic?
My values are defined, and non-conformist - so am I now your “fascist”?
I’m actually tolerant and democratic - so does that now make me eratic?
I’m flexible enough to have changed some perspectives - ‘sit for that I receive your invectives?
On whichever soil I reside, I’m a patriot - for this shall I one day be shot?
********************
Right after I'd spun that one off on the ideologizing of gayness, I received with great pleasure and gratitude the news that one of Germany's most visible gay spokesmen is mobilizing gays to finally grasp that Islam has plans for Europe and that is very bad news for any notions of gay human rights, and every hard-won advance made over these decades. Sometimes it just takes time to set in. I welcome them to the barricades!
I have often maintained that the best response I have to those wishing to designate me as "Islamophobic," is that I'm not motivated by irrational fear, rather they are Islamophiles - but David Berger here improved on my response in self-reflectively nailing the actual motivation driving Islamophiles: fear!
https://gegenislam.wordpress.com/2015/11/15/david-berger-ruft-nach-anschlaegen-homosexuelle-zum-kampf-auf/
http://www.gaystream.info/#!Islamismus-und-Schwule-Unsere-Rechte-werden-als-erstes-sterben/cjds/5648552d0cf2708e001b5ed7
Today's Cult of Mental Disorder(s): its Propopents, its Apologists and its Appeasers...
A classically narcisstic Lobby based on contrived assertions which are entirely sexist, racist, atheistic in nature, entirely pseudo-scientific with articles of faith - and aspiring in its tyranncial demands, to establish an extreme-Left power curve with venomous results. And so far, it's working.
"Gender and Transgender" politics and the beatification of "Victimhood" - or, one example of how one sidesteps the actual need for available and positive professional therapy, by making "everything normal" (and calling this diversity, of course).
So, anticipating the usual ideologically (idiot-logical) fixated sh*tstorm, I'm posting this more visibly than I had already, because it's well worth it.
(Followed by an equally worthwhile re-posting on WHY the above mentioned is working...)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aDAU3SPYFsA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=10B9Fc8BmR0
Sunday, November 16, 2014
If I'm a Homo – Let It Be Sapiens
Some of my best friends are not gay,
nor lesbian for that matter – is that okay?
Some of my best friends might be either,
my being hetero concerns them neither.
Do I have to know with which gender you sleep,
any more than you must, which company I keep?
The reason that I do not know is that I don't inquire,
the urge toward such irrelevance awakens no desire.
Does my knowing if one's gay build mine or your character?
Is sexuality no longer that but only what's politic'ly correcter?
What's private, own and intimate no longer's sacred – all must know!
Then why is no one interested that I'm a flaming hetero!
A 'phobe a 'phobe a homophobe – is what I'll likely hear:
If I don't pass the Tolerance-Test I must be nursing a latent fear!
The trend, the ideology, the current coin, The Faith:
Believe in Gender-Mainstreaming and all that's preached as truth!
All perspectives, views, opinions have a place in true diversity,
except new dogma's dictates place a muzzle on democracy.
So yes, I'm Homo, I'm coming out – and you're one too, I've said it!
We're both one Homo sapiens, kid, I wish you'd finally get it!
nor lesbian for that matter – is that okay?
Some of my best friends might be either,
my being hetero concerns them neither.
Do I have to know with which gender you sleep,
any more than you must, which company I keep?
The reason that I do not know is that I don't inquire,
the urge toward such irrelevance awakens no desire.
Does my knowing if one's gay build mine or your character?
Is sexuality no longer that but only what's politic'ly correcter?
What's private, own and intimate no longer's sacred – all must know!
Then why is no one interested that I'm a flaming hetero!
A 'phobe a 'phobe a homophobe – is what I'll likely hear:
If I don't pass the Tolerance-Test I must be nursing a latent fear!
The trend, the ideology, the current coin, The Faith:
Believe in Gender-Mainstreaming and all that's preached as truth!
All perspectives, views, opinions have a place in true diversity,
except new dogma's dictates place a muzzle on democracy.
So yes, I'm Homo, I'm coming out – and you're one too, I've said it!
We're both one Homo sapiens, kid, I wish you'd finally get it!
http://samuelinayatchisti.blogspot.de/2011/05/for-mevlana.html
Sunday, September 21, 2014
I May Surely Get Whacked For This:
When gays or lesbians or bisexuals are simply permitted to be
comfortable with their sexual orientation in an accepting society free
of stigma or defamation, isolation, pressure to hide or repress this (or
as in Muslim countries, murder or public execution) - that is a matter
of human rights. That's it. I'm hetero, my sons and daughters all are
as well. So? And I've always conveyed to them the inalienable
recognition of human rights, whomever it addresses.
When, however, everything becomes glaringly, invasively, redundantly, unavoidably about the sexual orientation of Ls, Gs, Bs, Ts - and that they are somehow all "wonderful" for it - and YOU are sexist, homophobic and "white male"-fascist (wherever that one came from!) for even suggesting that you are perhaps becoming more than fed up with having a cartoony Rainbow ceaselessly shoved down your throat: this is Ideology. And, as I've often asserted and cannot stress enough: all good things turn rancid when they hit Ideology. Dogma kills, it deadens with the slow blows of a cudgel.
Fundamentalist or Fascist, Communist or Capitalist or Collectivist, Right or Left: it dries up all life with the same dumbing-down demand for compliance and obedience.
Are Jews "special" because there was a Holocaust or we all loved "Fiddler On The Roof"? No. They are Jews.
Are African-Americans "special" because of their forced immigration to serve "The Peculiar Institution" and enduring a century of Jim Crow? No. They are African-Americans.
Are gays and lesbians "special" because the overweening trend says so? No.
All three examples are human beings who have endured persecution and worse.
All three have also contributed vastly to our culture with their creativity.
Ideology is dictatorship over the mind, above all. It dictates what you may or may not think, what is "permitted" and what not - it is a "one-size-fits-all" dogma which holds you to a brain-sucking "political-correctness" and goads or intimidates or punishes you with propaganda and character assassination if you don't behave and get in line.
To introduce being gay as The New Norm would be like making Jewish or Black the "preferred" norm. If I run for office or am in some other public position, should I make being hetero the hallmark of my character or accomplishment? Why then must I know of someone's non-hetero sexual orientation as if that has anything to do with his/her actual values, judgement, competence, character, stability, suitability; am I homophobic for still considering the bedroom a private matter?
Here's another way of formulating this:
Ask a Jew what makes him/her "Jewish." You'll get a whole variety of possible responses, from biblical to philosophical to banal to humanistic, history and heritage, values and community. I'd wager that at the bottom of the list, if at all, you might hear circumcision or diet.
Ask a Muslim the same question, you get "no pork." That's it. A pork-abstinent Jew doesn't count, a vegetarian (from the Planet Vegan) doesn't count; only Muslims count, and without knowing squat really, most will give you as Number One Criteria: no pork. All else follows.
So I may get myself placed among the racists, sexists, homophobix, Islamophobix - please add antisemites - because the Ideologues and Lobbyists for the Cult and Culture of Political Correctness so dictate.
Still, I will maintain to my last dying breath at the ripe age of 150:
that every human being is to be treated with dignity and respect, kindness and empathy. Because s/he is Human. Not because s/he is special. No one is. But every One is divine in origin - no exceptions.
And that is what I pass on to the kids.
When, however, everything becomes glaringly, invasively, redundantly, unavoidably about the sexual orientation of Ls, Gs, Bs, Ts - and that they are somehow all "wonderful" for it - and YOU are sexist, homophobic and "white male"-fascist (wherever that one came from!) for even suggesting that you are perhaps becoming more than fed up with having a cartoony Rainbow ceaselessly shoved down your throat: this is Ideology. And, as I've often asserted and cannot stress enough: all good things turn rancid when they hit Ideology. Dogma kills, it deadens with the slow blows of a cudgel.
Fundamentalist or Fascist, Communist or Capitalist or Collectivist, Right or Left: it dries up all life with the same dumbing-down demand for compliance and obedience.
Are Jews "special" because there was a Holocaust or we all loved "Fiddler On The Roof"? No. They are Jews.
Are African-Americans "special" because of their forced immigration to serve "The Peculiar Institution" and enduring a century of Jim Crow? No. They are African-Americans.
Are gays and lesbians "special" because the overweening trend says so? No.
All three examples are human beings who have endured persecution and worse.
All three have also contributed vastly to our culture with their creativity.
Ideology is dictatorship over the mind, above all. It dictates what you may or may not think, what is "permitted" and what not - it is a "one-size-fits-all" dogma which holds you to a brain-sucking "political-correctness" and goads or intimidates or punishes you with propaganda and character assassination if you don't behave and get in line.
To introduce being gay as The New Norm would be like making Jewish or Black the "preferred" norm. If I run for office or am in some other public position, should I make being hetero the hallmark of my character or accomplishment? Why then must I know of someone's non-hetero sexual orientation as if that has anything to do with his/her actual values, judgement, competence, character, stability, suitability; am I homophobic for still considering the bedroom a private matter?
Here's another way of formulating this:
Ask a Jew what makes him/her "Jewish." You'll get a whole variety of possible responses, from biblical to philosophical to banal to humanistic, history and heritage, values and community. I'd wager that at the bottom of the list, if at all, you might hear circumcision or diet.
Ask a Muslim the same question, you get "no pork." That's it. A pork-abstinent Jew doesn't count, a vegetarian (from the Planet Vegan) doesn't count; only Muslims count, and without knowing squat really, most will give you as Number One Criteria: no pork. All else follows.
So I may get myself placed among the racists, sexists, homophobix, Islamophobix - please add antisemites - because the Ideologues and Lobbyists for the Cult and Culture of Political Correctness so dictate.
Still, I will maintain to my last dying breath at the ripe age of 150:
that every human being is to be treated with dignity and respect, kindness and empathy. Because s/he is Human. Not because s/he is special. No one is. But every One is divine in origin - no exceptions.
And that is what I pass on to the kids.
http://samuelinayatchisti.blogspot.de/2014/04/a-critical-look-if-one-still-may-at.html
http://samuelinayatchisti.blogspot.de/2014/05/reactions-to-my-lgtb-critique.html
http://samuelinayatchisti.blogspot.de/2014/05/reactions-to-my-lgtb-critique.html
Sunday, July 6, 2014
Facing Any Mob: I Am A Social-Democrat
If you are being beaten or lynched by a mob,
whether literally or figurative-ideologically,
I will not hesitate to come to your aid,
to place myself between you and that mob,
to defend your life and your right to life.
I will not support your victimhood,
I will stand shoulder to shoulder with you
and face off the mob which outnumbers you.
Come what may.
I'd do this without hesitation,
because my Beloved would have it so;
I am a social-democrat not by dogma
but by conviction, out of instinct and principle.
I have no Party and recognize none.
My soul rests in my Beloved's hands.
If you are gay and facing that mob, or if you are hetero;
if you are of any religious persuasion – any – or of none,
and facing that mob; if you are a woman or a man,
if you are of any ethnicity or nationality facing the extinction
through the mob, of your very identity;
if you are simply of your own opinion and facing that mob:
I will stand by you, and my eyes will be clear,
my nerves resting in the purpose of my Beloved,
we will rise to the occasion without fear.
And if YOU ARE the mob, whether you are
gay or hetero, Muslim or Evangelical, Haredi or atheist,
male or female, from the fascists of the Right or of the Left,
pork-hater or racist or Establishment-sheeple-rep;
and
if you intend to beat or pillory or lynch anyone
on my watch –
whether literally or figurative-ideologically –
then hear this:
I will stand against you with that one,
shoulder to shoulder, come what may,
I will mount the barricades and I will confront you.
I am not large, but I am determined.
I am a social-democrat by conviction,
by instinct and principle, I cannot be intimidated.
My soul rests in the hands of my Beloved.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIHV8Xp4N4g
Sunday, May 18, 2014
Reactions To My LGTB Critique
I found this thought provoking...and worrisome. I have seen these
trends before too.....To intellectualize and "straight'splain"
the lived experiences of LGBTQI folk.
The time from being a victim of persecution for your actions and
beliefs to trying to impose your beliefs upon others seems very
short. The Pilgrims come to mind. Is this human nature? I am right
therefore you must agree with me? My way is right for me, but your
way is right for you, what is wrong with that? Where is tolerance
and love? Love for all and all for love, not all being the same as
me, or all being the same as you. Being human has a great deal of
uniqueness and specialness for all humans. Personal and
transpersonal appears to be a difficult concept for many to absorb.
Yes your Jesus's love for you is universal, but it is not my path, I
say to the Christians. Yes Allah's love is universal, I say to the
Muslims, but it is not my path. I love lesbians and gay men, I truly
do, but it is not my path. We can all have our own temples and shtup
in our own way with our own beloveds and all of us, in our own way
can fill liminal time with the love and light of the universe that
we make when we make our own vortexes, our own temples of love. Love
for All , and All for Love. Stuart/Shemesh.
Wow. Okay. Where the hell do I even start?
Firstly, you are racist. The literal state of multiculturalism is the natural outcome of diaspora, with people moving all around the world. It's been going on since before Alexandria. There is no such thing as a 'pure' culture to begin with, and the policies nations make to facilitate peaceful multiculturalism - you know, the state where a pluralistic society can function without dissolving into warlord-ruled territories - are not part of some Great White Conspiracy. It has an awful lot more to do with the ability to fly half-way around the world for under $2000 USD, settle in a new place, and absorb (or reject) the customs and culture with relative freedom.
Not to mention, condemning the mixing of race as 'abhorrent' is pretty racist, okay?
1) The myth of homosexual and trans 'specialness'. This does not actually exist, except in the minds of straight (armchair) psychoanalysts. Gay people, by and large, do not think they are 'special'. They are, however, often damaged, and they have brittle self-concepts which may lead some people into narcissistic behavior. This isn't a part of 'gayness'. Straight people do this too. They abuse substances and feel shame about their sexuality and cut. So do some LGBT people. It is not because we are gay, bi or trans.
2) Straight guys speculating on the ability of gay men and trans people to complete 'inner work' makes me squicky. They and you do not, in fact, get to 'address' us, and tell us how we develop ourselves as human beings. You do not get to 'plumb the personal-societal hitches' in us. You can ask US how we develop ourselves as human beings, and we will communicate our methods if we desire to. Because we have this thing called 'agency'.
You don't actually have the authority to speculate on what makes or breaks a wise gay man - or a wise anyone else, for that matter.
3) Gay people and trans people still live with shame and misrepresentation, and under-representation, and stigma. Just because your social bubble doesn't seem to include it, doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
4) Being butthurt when people call you out on your opinions doesn't constitute persecution, 'political correctness' or suppression of free speech. You always have freedom of speech, which is the legal right to say whatever you want, and other people also have the right to freedom of speech, which includes telling you that your subjective opinions and feelings are offensive and you should probably rethink them. Persecution is someone coming to your house and writing GOD HATES MALE NURSES on your door, okay? It's when people key your car, beat the shit out of you, deny you employment, food, water or shelter, or abuse you because of who you are. Not what you say. *What you are*.
5) Critical thinking includes respecting the agency of others. Your essay reads like 'Speculations of the Persecuted White Man Upon the Nature of the Homosexual Agenda'. It does not represent critical thought or tolerance.
6) Including LGBT-related education in schools is not 'sexualising children with propaganda'. TV shows depicting underage girls in go-go boots and miniskirts is sexualized propaganda. Teaching young children how to respectfully and sanely deal with others in a pluralistic society is not.
7) Change gender 'with good reason'. Who the hell are you to decide what 'good reasons' are?
LGBT is an acronym used by the people in my community as a short-hand for aspects of their lived experiences. It isn't a 'sacred' political showpony for anything. By generalizing it as some bid for attention, you do a massive disservice to the people in my communities who have suffered and often died to establish a baseline of human rights which heterosexual men have had for hundreds of years.
The rights of others do not end where your feelings begin. You may have convinced yourself of your tolerance, wisdom and self-enlightenment, but I assure you that you're not fooling me.
Firstly, you are racist. The literal state of multiculturalism is the natural outcome of diaspora, with people moving all around the world. It's been going on since before Alexandria. There is no such thing as a 'pure' culture to begin with, and the policies nations make to facilitate peaceful multiculturalism - you know, the state where a pluralistic society can function without dissolving into warlord-ruled territories - are not part of some Great White Conspiracy. It has an awful lot more to do with the ability to fly half-way around the world for under $2000 USD, settle in a new place, and absorb (or reject) the customs and culture with relative freedom.
Not to mention, condemning the mixing of race as 'abhorrent' is pretty racist, okay?
1) The myth of homosexual and trans 'specialness'. This does not actually exist, except in the minds of straight (armchair) psychoanalysts. Gay people, by and large, do not think they are 'special'. They are, however, often damaged, and they have brittle self-concepts which may lead some people into narcissistic behavior. This isn't a part of 'gayness'. Straight people do this too. They abuse substances and feel shame about their sexuality and cut. So do some LGBT people. It is not because we are gay, bi or trans.
2) Straight guys speculating on the ability of gay men and trans people to complete 'inner work' makes me squicky. They and you do not, in fact, get to 'address' us, and tell us how we develop ourselves as human beings. You do not get to 'plumb the personal-societal hitches' in us. You can ask US how we develop ourselves as human beings, and we will communicate our methods if we desire to. Because we have this thing called 'agency'.
You don't actually have the authority to speculate on what makes or breaks a wise gay man - or a wise anyone else, for that matter.
3) Gay people and trans people still live with shame and misrepresentation, and under-representation, and stigma. Just because your social bubble doesn't seem to include it, doesn't mean it doesn't happen.
4) Being butthurt when people call you out on your opinions doesn't constitute persecution, 'political correctness' or suppression of free speech. You always have freedom of speech, which is the legal right to say whatever you want, and other people also have the right to freedom of speech, which includes telling you that your subjective opinions and feelings are offensive and you should probably rethink them. Persecution is someone coming to your house and writing GOD HATES MALE NURSES on your door, okay? It's when people key your car, beat the shit out of you, deny you employment, food, water or shelter, or abuse you because of who you are. Not what you say. *What you are*.
5) Critical thinking includes respecting the agency of others. Your essay reads like 'Speculations of the Persecuted White Man Upon the Nature of the Homosexual Agenda'. It does not represent critical thought or tolerance.
6) Including LGBT-related education in schools is not 'sexualising children with propaganda'. TV shows depicting underage girls in go-go boots and miniskirts is sexualized propaganda. Teaching young children how to respectfully and sanely deal with others in a pluralistic society is not.
7) Change gender 'with good reason'. Who the hell are you to decide what 'good reasons' are?
LGBT is an acronym used by the people in my community as a short-hand for aspects of their lived experiences. It isn't a 'sacred' political showpony for anything. By generalizing it as some bid for attention, you do a massive disservice to the people in my communities who have suffered and often died to establish a baseline of human rights which heterosexual men have had for hundreds of years.
The rights of others do not end where your feelings begin. You may have convinced yourself of your tolerance, wisdom and self-enlightenment, but I assure you that you're not fooling me.
James - and others - thank you for
sharing. It doesn't matter to me whether we view something with the
same eye or conclusion, I welcome any authentic reaction or
heart-felt response. Dialogue is better than blind acceptance of
anything. Yes, Aunty - I AM addressing a trend here, one which is quite worrisome, and that is the point.
That you state it doesn't matter to you
Sam, is, in fact, very clear. James has articulated my thoughts on
your writing.
When I wrote this I knew that some might not understand a word of
what I'm saying and therefore not react or respond. Others would
understand and perhaps relate but not trust themselves to openly
express an agreement due to the pressure of political-correctness.
Still others would partially understand what I'm saying or
misunderstand it and either not react or react negatively or even
express their version of agreement for reasons I certainly never
intended. The latter cannot often be helped, but next to that I
actually prefer those who, like James, have read it through and
strongly disagree and express authentically and with passion –
even if we remain in disagreement on aspects, I prefer this.
While I don't take James' or others' criticism of my criticism personally – however you express it, which I understand and respect – you seem to have taken my piece quite personally and I'm sorry to hear that, so I have to underscore one thing above all: anything good, risks being intellectually and morally compromised and hijacked once it's allowed to become an ideology – which does happen – and passive, unquestioning compliance toward any ideology, toward any agenda (corporate, gummint, or societal), especially when it has reached the forced and enforced dictate of PC-by-decree, is unconscious and dangerous. It is the death knell for Thinking, for Thought. Critical thought is the basis for deepening understanding, mutual recognition and renewal. Compliance will never deliver that – so where do we want to go with this?
One's sexual orientation or gender identity as one defines it for oneself (if one still can) is not only a private matter but a sacred one and one's right to be that and to own it. It should not concern anyone else or society, and persecution or ostracization is outof the question. I hope I am being clear on that.
I don't know which lexicon others are using, but according to my understanding: racism is hatred or contempt and mistrust toward any particular race, i.e., ethnic group – so what "race" was being addressed here, wherewith I come off as "racist"?
Sexism would have been a better attempt to diss me, however sexism is an outward societal expression of contempt or mistrust or need to humiliate, covering for a deeply embedded misogyny – i.e., toward the opposite sex which means in a male-dominated culture as we've known, toward women.
Either racism or sexism can be overt or covert, as with antisemitism, another "ism". Speaking as a Jew, can anyone here imagine me calling someone an antisemite because s/he doesn't consider Jews the best thing on earth since chickens gave us soup? Or doesn't share my brand of flag-waving Zionism or non-Zionistic recognition of Israel (whose policies are of course 'always right') or jump on the Holocaust-Industry wagon with the mantra 'never-again'? Frankly, my toleration goes so far as to tolerate anyone his or her antisemitism, racism, sexism – until that one is placed in any position of power at whatever level, whether lobby or political or autocratic. And then I will man the barricades, I will take to the streets, whatever means are at my disposal, I will always speak, and if it's at the cost of my life, for the weak, the repressed, the disadvantaged.
Are my FB-friends reading this aware of the persecution toward gays across the board in every Muslim country? That gay Palestinians who face mistreatment, even torture and execution in Gaza, scramble over that damned wall into Tel Aviv so they can just be themselves, and this among the "sworn enemy"?
Why does The Great Lobby never address the draconic repression of gays in Muslim countries? Why, for that matter do American "Christians" feel so persecuted when the real persecuted Christians are in most if not all Muslim countries, where you dare not open a Bible, erect or repair a church, but the mosques and Qur'ans are flourishing all over the States and Europe without any concern for local indigent culture or customs? Because another Great Lobby, calling itself Islam, has got the West by the short hairs and no one is (likewise) permitted to even question this for fear of "offending Muslims" – who are notorious for shunning hard reflection, introspection, self-criticism, development. My own views toward Islam after 40 years of Sufism are my concern, and that's for me to work out – yet I am anything but shy about critically looking at it.
But back to my statement from Gurdjieff concerning homosexuals, which brought this reaction oninthe first place: if one reads that carefully, I - i.e., he made it clear it was not one's homosexuality which mattered, but that generations-old conditioned shame toward it, coupled with it's corresponding and compensating notions of specialness. A very great American Swami who'd left behind a serious school of inner work and spiritual development, Rudrananda by name, or Rudi, was – so I'm told, I don't know because he never said so himself – gay. I can imagine this possibly being so, and it's not only fine, it also poses no contradiction here. What I find more interesting is that he made no matter out of it, it neither prevented nor enhanced his development – and knowing Rudi I can only surmise why: because he was free of shame over this or anything else about himself, nor did he indulge in any degree of feeling special (as opposed to – what, normal or ordinary).
I'm more in agreement with what you have written than may appear, but that's par for the course. I understand that my writing hit a nerve, so whether you can hear this or not, I do and always will embrace, for yourself: manifesting as you are, who you are - with all dignity and with all lovingkindness.
Dear James – and Jane/Aunty – this is already much longer than I'd wished to say, so I'll close here, wishing any readers and/or commnetators well, and as always welcoming your reflective input.
While I don't take James' or others' criticism of my criticism personally – however you express it, which I understand and respect – you seem to have taken my piece quite personally and I'm sorry to hear that, so I have to underscore one thing above all: anything good, risks being intellectually and morally compromised and hijacked once it's allowed to become an ideology – which does happen – and passive, unquestioning compliance toward any ideology, toward any agenda (corporate, gummint, or societal), especially when it has reached the forced and enforced dictate of PC-by-decree, is unconscious and dangerous. It is the death knell for Thinking, for Thought. Critical thought is the basis for deepening understanding, mutual recognition and renewal. Compliance will never deliver that – so where do we want to go with this?
One's sexual orientation or gender identity as one defines it for oneself (if one still can) is not only a private matter but a sacred one and one's right to be that and to own it. It should not concern anyone else or society, and persecution or ostracization is outof the question. I hope I am being clear on that.
I don't know which lexicon others are using, but according to my understanding: racism is hatred or contempt and mistrust toward any particular race, i.e., ethnic group – so what "race" was being addressed here, wherewith I come off as "racist"?
Sexism would have been a better attempt to diss me, however sexism is an outward societal expression of contempt or mistrust or need to humiliate, covering for a deeply embedded misogyny – i.e., toward the opposite sex which means in a male-dominated culture as we've known, toward women.
Either racism or sexism can be overt or covert, as with antisemitism, another "ism". Speaking as a Jew, can anyone here imagine me calling someone an antisemite because s/he doesn't consider Jews the best thing on earth since chickens gave us soup? Or doesn't share my brand of flag-waving Zionism or non-Zionistic recognition of Israel (whose policies are of course 'always right') or jump on the Holocaust-Industry wagon with the mantra 'never-again'? Frankly, my toleration goes so far as to tolerate anyone his or her antisemitism, racism, sexism – until that one is placed in any position of power at whatever level, whether lobby or political or autocratic. And then I will man the barricades, I will take to the streets, whatever means are at my disposal, I will always speak, and if it's at the cost of my life, for the weak, the repressed, the disadvantaged.
Are my FB-friends reading this aware of the persecution toward gays across the board in every Muslim country? That gay Palestinians who face mistreatment, even torture and execution in Gaza, scramble over that damned wall into Tel Aviv so they can just be themselves, and this among the "sworn enemy"?
Why does The Great Lobby never address the draconic repression of gays in Muslim countries? Why, for that matter do American "Christians" feel so persecuted when the real persecuted Christians are in most if not all Muslim countries, where you dare not open a Bible, erect or repair a church, but the mosques and Qur'ans are flourishing all over the States and Europe without any concern for local indigent culture or customs? Because another Great Lobby, calling itself Islam, has got the West by the short hairs and no one is (likewise) permitted to even question this for fear of "offending Muslims" – who are notorious for shunning hard reflection, introspection, self-criticism, development. My own views toward Islam after 40 years of Sufism are my concern, and that's for me to work out – yet I am anything but shy about critically looking at it.
But back to my statement from Gurdjieff concerning homosexuals, which brought this reaction oninthe first place: if one reads that carefully, I - i.e., he made it clear it was not one's homosexuality which mattered, but that generations-old conditioned shame toward it, coupled with it's corresponding and compensating notions of specialness. A very great American Swami who'd left behind a serious school of inner work and spiritual development, Rudrananda by name, or Rudi, was – so I'm told, I don't know because he never said so himself – gay. I can imagine this possibly being so, and it's not only fine, it also poses no contradiction here. What I find more interesting is that he made no matter out of it, it neither prevented nor enhanced his development – and knowing Rudi I can only surmise why: because he was free of shame over this or anything else about himself, nor did he indulge in any degree of feeling special (as opposed to – what, normal or ordinary).
I'm more in agreement with what you have written than may appear, but that's par for the course. I understand that my writing hit a nerve, so whether you can hear this or not, I do and always will embrace, for yourself: manifesting as you are, who you are - with all dignity and with all lovingkindness.
Dear James – and Jane/Aunty – this is already much longer than I'd wished to say, so I'll close here, wishing any readers and/or commnetators well, and as always welcoming your reflective input.
Reading this I feel some sadness but
then I love harmony and agreement. It seems to me there is a lot of
in group out group bickering going on and I will not participate in
that. Love for All and All for Love, that is what I am devoted to and
the conflicts of other I do not embrace.
Dear readers! I'll say this, and if there is any failure of
communication I'll consider it my own, as I had meant to include
this point in my last statement, but it slipped my mind after all.
No one is "special" - not the Jews, and not the gays. That said,
everyone – every single person, being divine in origin and a
fellow sentient being, a soul – is to be regarded as special, and
no person is ever to be treated with contempt, ever. This is the
very core of the matter. I would like to make that clear above
all.
And among the several things Jews and gays have always shared in common, are these: a) you will always find both everywhere on the globe, in the most unimagined places and the most unimagined trappings; b) both are marked with a strong creative bent, and the entire film and stage and arts and entertainment industry would be nothing compared to what it is, minus the Jews and gays (Berlin/Germany at all, has scrambled these past couple decades to try to gain back a Jewish culture of arts and entertainment after having lost all of that to the Third Reich, as well as the sending of any known homosexuals to the Camps – during which, BTW, the number of gay SA troops back then could have alone filled several Concentration Camps, just one of the ironies of the Nazis – and during my first years here in Berlin there still lived and functioned one of the foremost local Neo-Nazi leaders, Michael Kühne, who was known to be gay and ended up dying of AIDS); and c) Jews and gays have even been found in numbers among orders and ashrams and monasteries and what have you all over the world at any time – but also found alike in Communist and Capitalist structures in history. So much for being special.
Now, as to male nurses and this hetero writer, and homosexuals: I'm a white Jewish male nurse living and working home-visits in Berlin. In the early '80s I was a home-visiting caregiver, in 1985 this was all in San Francisco. In that year I had a number of AIDS patients, this at a time when the current attitude was that so much as the merest contact with them without lots of protection could cost you your life. I never used gloves or any other covering, I came as I was and worked as I was, gloves for me were only for changing soiled diapers or shorts, cleaning butts and so forth -the obvious.
One of my patients was a Palestinian, one was Black – both died on my watch. All got the same physcial care from me, AIDS meant nothing in this equation, it might as well have been terminal cancer (which I also saw on my watch).
I had to take the bus up to a Twin Peaks residence for four or five nights running, during a two week period where I worked shifts back to back with about two hours actual sleep per day, money being tight. There sat my patient in the very last stages of AIDS, sitting upright in the living room while his partner, also now evidencing spots of Karposi's Sarcoma, created atmosphere in the company of friends in their circle playing pinochle or canasta all through the night. His very loving partner requested of me, as the patient had been a long-practicing Buddhist, to read to him privately from the Tibetan Book of the Dead. As I responded that it so happened I'm quite familiar myself with it and had read it at times doing night shift in nursing homes, we were agreed. The others, politely but nonetheless clearly seeing me as an unfortunately necessary hetero intruder who certainly must be carrying all his prejudices toward gays with him, especially when he says he's enternig the military later that month, these went on chatting and playing cards. I read aloud quietly, and this went on for the first two of those four nights. On the third night, upon my arrival, the patient was confined to bed, no covers, just laynig there and his partner very distraught. I followed all of his cues, he had placed pictures of the patient's teachers before the bed, and he and I lay close on either side of the paitent, I to the right, he to the left, and according to the patient's earlier stated wishes, we snuggled up close to him and whispered into his ears the name Amitabha, addressing this way the Buddha of Compassion.
The patient was skeletal, sweaty all over and smelling of it – and there I was, all white and hetero, without gloves or anything between my clothes and his body, closely cuddling him, my left arm crooked under his neck; his partner corresponding lay likewise. And so this fella expired.
We lay there for a bit, we opened a window, his partner needed a time-out and left the room. I said, fine, I'll just stay right here a bit. Actually my duties were all as of this moment over – officially.
I thought, hmm, I have time, the first bus comes at 4 a.m., the undertakers won't arrive quite yet, what to do with a body – what do they do in movies? Right: wash the body. Wasn't in my job description, but I have always been more than a job description. So I asked them for a basin and cloth and towel. I washed that body from top to bottom, I washed and turned it as thoroughly and as gently and attentively as if it were a still living person, and when I was finished I felt satisfied, now the matter was done, dignity was complete.
As I left the room and returned into the living room, the whole group, every man of them, stood there moved in speechless gratitude, and then for the first time in those three nights all fell into natural and easy conversation with me. We parted on the best of terms.
And you know what? There is nothing special in this. It is just being Human. Would anyone reading this have done otherwise?
And among the several things Jews and gays have always shared in common, are these: a) you will always find both everywhere on the globe, in the most unimagined places and the most unimagined trappings; b) both are marked with a strong creative bent, and the entire film and stage and arts and entertainment industry would be nothing compared to what it is, minus the Jews and gays (Berlin/Germany at all, has scrambled these past couple decades to try to gain back a Jewish culture of arts and entertainment after having lost all of that to the Third Reich, as well as the sending of any known homosexuals to the Camps – during which, BTW, the number of gay SA troops back then could have alone filled several Concentration Camps, just one of the ironies of the Nazis – and during my first years here in Berlin there still lived and functioned one of the foremost local Neo-Nazi leaders, Michael Kühne, who was known to be gay and ended up dying of AIDS); and c) Jews and gays have even been found in numbers among orders and ashrams and monasteries and what have you all over the world at any time – but also found alike in Communist and Capitalist structures in history. So much for being special.
Now, as to male nurses and this hetero writer, and homosexuals: I'm a white Jewish male nurse living and working home-visits in Berlin. In the early '80s I was a home-visiting caregiver, in 1985 this was all in San Francisco. In that year I had a number of AIDS patients, this at a time when the current attitude was that so much as the merest contact with them without lots of protection could cost you your life. I never used gloves or any other covering, I came as I was and worked as I was, gloves for me were only for changing soiled diapers or shorts, cleaning butts and so forth -the obvious.
One of my patients was a Palestinian, one was Black – both died on my watch. All got the same physcial care from me, AIDS meant nothing in this equation, it might as well have been terminal cancer (which I also saw on my watch).
I had to take the bus up to a Twin Peaks residence for four or five nights running, during a two week period where I worked shifts back to back with about two hours actual sleep per day, money being tight. There sat my patient in the very last stages of AIDS, sitting upright in the living room while his partner, also now evidencing spots of Karposi's Sarcoma, created atmosphere in the company of friends in their circle playing pinochle or canasta all through the night. His very loving partner requested of me, as the patient had been a long-practicing Buddhist, to read to him privately from the Tibetan Book of the Dead. As I responded that it so happened I'm quite familiar myself with it and had read it at times doing night shift in nursing homes, we were agreed. The others, politely but nonetheless clearly seeing me as an unfortunately necessary hetero intruder who certainly must be carrying all his prejudices toward gays with him, especially when he says he's enternig the military later that month, these went on chatting and playing cards. I read aloud quietly, and this went on for the first two of those four nights. On the third night, upon my arrival, the patient was confined to bed, no covers, just laynig there and his partner very distraught. I followed all of his cues, he had placed pictures of the patient's teachers before the bed, and he and I lay close on either side of the paitent, I to the right, he to the left, and according to the patient's earlier stated wishes, we snuggled up close to him and whispered into his ears the name Amitabha, addressing this way the Buddha of Compassion.
The patient was skeletal, sweaty all over and smelling of it – and there I was, all white and hetero, without gloves or anything between my clothes and his body, closely cuddling him, my left arm crooked under his neck; his partner corresponding lay likewise. And so this fella expired.
We lay there for a bit, we opened a window, his partner needed a time-out and left the room. I said, fine, I'll just stay right here a bit. Actually my duties were all as of this moment over – officially.
I thought, hmm, I have time, the first bus comes at 4 a.m., the undertakers won't arrive quite yet, what to do with a body – what do they do in movies? Right: wash the body. Wasn't in my job description, but I have always been more than a job description. So I asked them for a basin and cloth and towel. I washed that body from top to bottom, I washed and turned it as thoroughly and as gently and attentively as if it were a still living person, and when I was finished I felt satisfied, now the matter was done, dignity was complete.
As I left the room and returned into the living room, the whole group, every man of them, stood there moved in speechless gratitude, and then for the first time in those three nights all fell into natural and easy conversation with me. We parted on the best of terms.
And you know what? There is nothing special in this. It is just being Human. Would anyone reading this have done otherwise?
Dear Stuart, back
in my early Berlin-barracks time shortly after arriving, end of the
'80s, I recall a Black female GI who went about angry, you know, Girl
With Attitude – and her t-shirt read, "It's a Black thing – you
wouldn't understand." As she caught me reading it, I very gently
informed her, "No, it's a Human thing – and I very well
might." Yes, I very fucking well might. And this same girl of
about 19 or 20, having issues with herself and her life, wound up in
the military clinic after suffering a crisis, a suicide call-for-help
sort of thing, upon hearing of which I dropped by the clinic for a
brief visit to her and to ask how she was coming along. She smiled very
sweetly and thanked me for coming.
As a hetero male
nurse myself, and one who can talk about up-close with AIDS patients
at a time when no one generally dared, it pains me to see how James
and Aunty – neither of whose comments I'd solicited but neither of
which I also rejected or wrote off – how swiftly they could write
me off and not take one moment to investigate me, show any interest
in broadening out of their shells, but regurgitated only what suited
them. So much for tolerance. This is what you get with movements
about tolerance, it's the death knell for exactly that, as no
criticism from "outside" is tolerated. You have experienced this
among women who don't want a man writing about Goddess, by which
negative attitude they assure further ignorance – they are not for
consciousness, nor are the ideologues of any matter or issue or
belief or view. It's the nature of things, that good things always
go sour when organized into a sytem of how-it's-gotta-be-now. These
who have so responded toward you and these who so respond toward me,
are as hooked on the unquestioning obedience they expect (and are now
getting!) from the very public by whom which they had expereineced
being or at least perceiving themselves as disadvantaged.
I don't know what
Jane/Aunty's problem with looking into this was, but neither she nor James
know me nor would ever take a moment to make this enriching by
pursuing it one step further. Their loss. It would have run
differently. If she really is psychic, why wouldn't she have figured
that out? So much for psychic, for openness, for listening to what
the other is saying (James filtered most of what I'd even said
through his preferred lens), so much for tolerance.
The original critique follows, for reference:
Saturday, April 12, 2014
A Critical Look (if one still may) at “LGBT“ as a Lobby & Movement
Speaking as one who has since the early '70s been awake to the dream of, desire to see, the civil and human rights of homosexuals, male or female, manifestly recognized and implemented once and for all – and an end to their ages old persecution; speaking as one who abhors the continuing status quo of persecution, torture and public execution of gays in any or all Muslim countries; and speaking as one who feels we've not only long achieved our ends in this matter in the West – in fact, that we have moreover over-achieved in the direction of an ideological extreme, I wish to address what I sadly and critically observe, with the hope that the following cogent points might somewhere strike a chord at this critical juncture.
As often happens: an old conditioned conformity winds up being replaced, not
by the freedom to think clearly - but by a new conformity-by-coercion,
holding us un-conscious and captive. This produces no gender-clarity
but more confusion, pseudo-scientific in some of its more militant
claims and contemptuous in its demands for over-relativized, highly
generalized "gender-mainstreaming" - a new catchword for the sheer
superficiality of our time. As with the increasingly questionable
manipulation of "multi-culti" - and the agenda hiding behind it, to so
much as question what is going on is to have oneself re-defined by its propaganda: as racist, or reactionary, or right-extreme, as the case may be.
John G. Bennett, in his Third Way School (as I recall – but google him), had quoted Gurdjieff in addressing homosexuals and their capacity for development in the Inner Work. This inner work comprised – and frankly would comprise in any School which ever has existed or does, for inner development of the Human Being – three aspects, namely: the exoteric, or outer; the mesoteric, or middle; and the esoteric, or inner. This having nothing to do with getting "elite" or "important" about anything, but about actual development, no one – and I repeat, no one – was or is saying that homosexuals do not or cannot develop in a spiritual training. Having said that, what Gurdjieff, according to Bennett, did address, was that while homosexuals would naturally advance like anyone else with right effort and intention, in the outer and the middle aspects, there were two things which alone hindered, if not prevented, them from attaining to the inner.
Minus these two things, there would be nothing barring the homosexual from advancing, so it has nothing to do with judgement but very astute observation: those two being 1) the sense of shame they carry, which of course one does after countless generations of being shamed for what one is – but it's an obstacle to development, a no-brainer; and 2) their sense of specialness.
Now this is interesting, I was struck by reading this some 35 years ago, struck and fascinated, and confronted and challenged to really look at that. The observation rang true as I'd always tried to plumb, as a heterosexual male, the personal-societal hitch in the psychological make-up of my gay brothers and sisters.
Folks, we have achieved the half: we have removed the first of the two, there is no more shame; but the second has still to be dealt with, and there lies the phenomenn I see all around me today.
We keep taking a good and noble idea and destroying it through the parody of ideology! We can no longer be fair without getting stupid, we can no longer be constructively critical without being called nazis or fascists or negativists of some sort or another!
Friends! When Political Correctness supercedes any right to the expression of critical thinking, and "tolerance" is the new coin for coerced acceptance, and to question a lobbied direction is to be branded without consideration as "discrimination" - what then becomes of Discriminating Wisdom? For example, racism is one thing - while lobbying for all races and skin colors to be null and become one race and one color is as abhorrent as it is absurd - I like all the races and skin tones and I am for mutual respectful appreciation of differences. I want all the nations and cultures to remain nations and cultures, and to develop naturally and progressively, I don't want a One World Government! The EU and NATO strive toward exactly this, and are getting it.
I frankly still embody the coming together of the most varied of religions to have them meet, listen, share, mutually appreciate and come away with something new and fresh - and I want my Catholics to be Catholics, Protestants Protestant, Buddhists to stay Buddhist, Jews Jews, Hindus Hindus - etc.! Sexism can be confronted without killing the erotic in ourselves through PC - or take abortion: as a liberal-thinking member of our culture, I'm not "for-abortions" as the oxymornic "pro-lifers" would call this, I am pro-choice, and therewith equally dismayed at the coerced abortions of China or like attitudes elsewhere, as in former East Germany. Returning to LGBT as a lobby, by becoming ideologized and rigidly overweening, the issues have become the new coin of "where you stand on..." - and woe unto you as parents if you do not want your child sexualized with propaganda at an early grade school age, making homosexuality such an issue over and above your right to guide your child according to your timing, to your lights, and to your discriminating wisdom. Or have we no more self-respect before every movement and every lobby which dictates how you orient ...!
I was also, since those early '70s, for the right to gender change of someone who with good reason could never relate to the gender he/she was born into, because I stand for the right of individuals to have access to lives full of grace and good-will, freedom and fulfillment, dignity and development, and the pursuit of happiness. The cult and culture of Political Correctness and mindless Relativism is not about that and never was. It is about the same ol' same ol' of power and domination, regardless of who's calling which shots. The relativism of being Politically Correct does not make something right.
Introducing sex-ed into early grade shool, even kindergarten, as is occurring today – at least in the EU-Regime's New Europe, and Canada, if not also the U.S. - and teaching, not merely acceptance toward (as if this also belongs to this age-group!) the new sacred-acronym, LGBT, but preference of and deference toward – mixing everything mindlessly up so that no discriminating power of the intellect may exist and everything becomes a gray sort of-kind of mentality with no compass, no reference point or orientation available or allowed to any individual's own moral perception – is not nor ever was my idea of a better future.
But that is the future we are having dictated to us, as lobbying ideologies only can do: dictate. It's the way of the world, as usual: power, control, domination.
This is not Love.
John G. Bennett, in his Third Way School (as I recall – but google him), had quoted Gurdjieff in addressing homosexuals and their capacity for development in the Inner Work. This inner work comprised – and frankly would comprise in any School which ever has existed or does, for inner development of the Human Being – three aspects, namely: the exoteric, or outer; the mesoteric, or middle; and the esoteric, or inner. This having nothing to do with getting "elite" or "important" about anything, but about actual development, no one – and I repeat, no one – was or is saying that homosexuals do not or cannot develop in a spiritual training. Having said that, what Gurdjieff, according to Bennett, did address, was that while homosexuals would naturally advance like anyone else with right effort and intention, in the outer and the middle aspects, there were two things which alone hindered, if not prevented, them from attaining to the inner.
Minus these two things, there would be nothing barring the homosexual from advancing, so it has nothing to do with judgement but very astute observation: those two being 1) the sense of shame they carry, which of course one does after countless generations of being shamed for what one is – but it's an obstacle to development, a no-brainer; and 2) their sense of specialness.
Now this is interesting, I was struck by reading this some 35 years ago, struck and fascinated, and confronted and challenged to really look at that. The observation rang true as I'd always tried to plumb, as a heterosexual male, the personal-societal hitch in the psychological make-up of my gay brothers and sisters.
Folks, we have achieved the half: we have removed the first of the two, there is no more shame; but the second has still to be dealt with, and there lies the phenomenn I see all around me today.
We keep taking a good and noble idea and destroying it through the parody of ideology! We can no longer be fair without getting stupid, we can no longer be constructively critical without being called nazis or fascists or negativists of some sort or another!
Friends! When Political Correctness supercedes any right to the expression of critical thinking, and "tolerance" is the new coin for coerced acceptance, and to question a lobbied direction is to be branded without consideration as "discrimination" - what then becomes of Discriminating Wisdom? For example, racism is one thing - while lobbying for all races and skin colors to be null and become one race and one color is as abhorrent as it is absurd - I like all the races and skin tones and I am for mutual respectful appreciation of differences. I want all the nations and cultures to remain nations and cultures, and to develop naturally and progressively, I don't want a One World Government! The EU and NATO strive toward exactly this, and are getting it.
I frankly still embody the coming together of the most varied of religions to have them meet, listen, share, mutually appreciate and come away with something new and fresh - and I want my Catholics to be Catholics, Protestants Protestant, Buddhists to stay Buddhist, Jews Jews, Hindus Hindus - etc.! Sexism can be confronted without killing the erotic in ourselves through PC - or take abortion: as a liberal-thinking member of our culture, I'm not "for-abortions" as the oxymornic "pro-lifers" would call this, I am pro-choice, and therewith equally dismayed at the coerced abortions of China or like attitudes elsewhere, as in former East Germany. Returning to LGBT as a lobby, by becoming ideologized and rigidly overweening, the issues have become the new coin of "where you stand on..." - and woe unto you as parents if you do not want your child sexualized with propaganda at an early grade school age, making homosexuality such an issue over and above your right to guide your child according to your timing, to your lights, and to your discriminating wisdom. Or have we no more self-respect before every movement and every lobby which dictates how you orient ...!
I was also, since those early '70s, for the right to gender change of someone who with good reason could never relate to the gender he/she was born into, because I stand for the right of individuals to have access to lives full of grace and good-will, freedom and fulfillment, dignity and development, and the pursuit of happiness. The cult and culture of Political Correctness and mindless Relativism is not about that and never was. It is about the same ol' same ol' of power and domination, regardless of who's calling which shots. The relativism of being Politically Correct does not make something right.
Introducing sex-ed into early grade shool, even kindergarten, as is occurring today – at least in the EU-Regime's New Europe, and Canada, if not also the U.S. - and teaching, not merely acceptance toward (as if this also belongs to this age-group!) the new sacred-acronym, LGBT, but preference of and deference toward – mixing everything mindlessly up so that no discriminating power of the intellect may exist and everything becomes a gray sort of-kind of mentality with no compass, no reference point or orientation available or allowed to any individual's own moral perception – is not nor ever was my idea of a better future.
But that is the future we are having dictated to us, as lobbying ideologies only can do: dictate. It's the way of the world, as usual: power, control, domination.
This is not Love.
Monday, July 22, 2013
SAN FRANCISCO: The Castro
(I came to
love that San Fran quite intimately, man to city I mean.
As one sees
here, I still carried my clichés but also appreciated much, and I
was still developing and coordinating my grasp vis-Ã -vis the gay
world/gay community.here or anywhere else. This graduated later to
real work-place friendships and still better contact. But re-reading
this and judging myself less, I have to say (to any detractors gay or
straight): I was undeniably there, certainly observing, and forming
honest reflections on it. Not to forget: this was also the exact
period there where I had my AIDS patients in care giving, and that
story of holding the one dying in my arms on the bed while havnig
read to him from the Tib. Book, as he wished, and now together with
his lover, whispering as he wished in his ear, Amitabha,
Amitabha........and then I washed his body, much to the very touched,
very moved, astonishment of his gay circle there in the livingroom
who had seen in me a bit of an intruding hetero – until then. I
cannot be gay and never could – had I been I'd long since have
lived it out here in Berlin at least, it was never my orientation,
not even bi-, not even to experinment...so why would I bother.
CASTRO
(San Francisco 1985)
Like an ethnos
all of its own this neighborhood
leave them alone
this gay ghetto:
here they have
their self-defined culture
within a
culture,
like gypsies are
they,
after a fashion
– flamboyant unabashed
and different.
The Mission is
where men speak to men in Latin dialects,
the Castro is
where men speak to men
in each other's
ear whispering the language of the body,
using the tongue
generously.
Meeting openly
in over-gesticulated celebration
of their common
difference flaunting
their preference
as you might your national heritage.
Like
eighth-grade girls I muse minus the plaid skirts and knee
socks,
as I watch the
display of carefree giddiness in grown men.
Conversations
dominated by a sexualectric charge
a sense I
perceive of imminent gratification
and every day is
Friday – is it possible,
I reflect, that
emotionally they have remained eighth-graders,
choosing at that
crucial age that to relate as a man
to a real woman
was untenable?
Man-lover
reading this, worshipper of Adonis rather than Aphrodite:
don't be
distressed or indignant everyone is learning -
Don't judge the
gap between us,
after all you
could be my son.
I don't wish you
dead I wish you well.
Overlooking the
leather the studs the makeup gawdy jewelry affectations,
I'm not abashed
to add, even Peter Pan could grow up
Wednesday, June 5, 2013
Body, Psyche, Sexuality
(you must be 16 or older to read this, please show ID)
I've massaged for some 40 years now. It
developed ad hoc without schooling, over time, on inspiration and
inner movement. I developed a style which made limbs and backs
and psyches feel great, I removed headaches in a few minutes, I began
with feet and stuck primarily with that for two years, washing and
massaging feet of every kind of person, friend or
detractor, acquaintance or stranger (and some were pretty strange), in
rooms or on the street or in parks, as an act of private discipline
and devotion toward my ideal. Foot-reflexological developed of its own
and became a specialty – the reflex book or two I much later
consulted or owned mostly served to confirm what I had already
intuitively learned through doing. And I'm still at it.
Massage is body work – nothing and no age-process or ill-health either disturbs or disgusts me. I love the body as I love my own. I found through massage that this was always effortless for me, it could not tire me out, as I felt coordinated with the other body (my back is your back is my back, so I automatically know what to do) - I always received energy in the giving, and the person felt great and I felt wonderful. And I'm still at it.
Massage is body work – nothing and no age-process or ill-health either disturbs or disgusts me. I love the body as I love my own. I found through massage that this was always effortless for me, it could not tire me out, as I felt coordinated with the other body (my back is your back is my back, so I automatically know what to do) - I always received energy in the giving, and the person felt great and I felt wonderful. And I'm still at it.
I have massaged men and women, children
and adults, of all ages, body types and conditions – gorgeous and
hot, ugly and plain, all are beautiful to me, all. In nursing school
here in Berlin I did a 6 or 7 week practical stint on maternity –
as a bonus I gave pressure-relaxation treatments
(Beruhigungsbehandlung) particularly designed for women on maternity
but good for anyone, and it was a huge hit, non-stop; this little
number I did pick up from someone, an alternative fellow-traveler
among my nursing faculty. And I'm still at it.
I have massaged men, gay and hetero,
and with the gays all went well (sometimes amusing because of their
expectations or because of my own residue of clichés) and even if
they had wishes I could not fulfill as a hetero I certainly had no
qualms about massaging them, as comfortably as with any other person
on earth. And nothing has changed.
Now when I massage – anyone, but
let's take women as I am going in this direction in this writing
anyway – I see through the massaging itself, only a woman's beauty.
There was a grade school teacher, 40ish, unattached with no sexlife
(or none currently) and with horrible lifelong acne on her face, she
was a client of mine for awhile many years ago. Nice bod, but that
acne! When I massaged her she became beautiful. First was my
imagination, then the transfer of this recognition into her – not
visualisation because I was just recognising her as she was –
through the touch, and she'd relax in herself, knowing through my
hands that she was loved and even possibly desirable as a woman. No
words about, no talk, all conveyed through the massage. She asked me
once after many sessions, how I would view her from the standpoint of
looks. First what went through my head was, “shit now what –
think fast and be authentic but accurate!“ Then I spoke from the
heart and knew the higher mind was speaking: I heard myself telling
her, when I look at her face I see the beauty behind the exterior.
She got it and was moved, soothed, relieved, satisfied. And it was
true: hearing my own words I got it: that you don't lie about the
acne, you don't give it center place either – you move beyond that
and talk real. People will know it, they're not stupid.
So I see the beauty, massage the
beauty, the beauty is awakened through this, and in the relaxation of
self-loathing, the beauty takes place and is there, it wells up from
within and rounds the body again or it descends from its banishment
back into the body like spirit and finds it place there where it
belongs. No shit. I really really do love bodies and I really
really do love women. And no bodily function or happening or
excretion scares me or inhibits me or disgusts me. That said, I have
no fetish-perversions nor entertain any, so I won't even go there.
Beauty is not in the barbie-look, an
exterior, culture-dictated babe-look isn't beauty, it's an empty shoe
box. Can't dance. Beauty has so many dimensions, and one dimension
which itself is multi-dimensional is the erotic component. I have
known this intimately in women who never would have turned a head by
ordinary standards – I have my own and stick to that - but I sensed
it with a nose for the erotic I could only wish every other guy.
Over the years the massage has also
developed its erotic component, I gave this full expression after
many years not having done so. And the results have far more often
been far more rewarding for both, than the occasional hit-and-miss.
I have had many lovers from many walks of life, and many ages, older
and younger than I. Some in their eighties. Very rewarding, and I
do mean mutually. Each a Sam-Story of its own.
There are - or have been, over my 25
years in this town, bordellos where I was a most welcome
semi-regular, where I arrived to massage and we took it all out in
trade, where I gave instruction in the “Tibetan 5 Rites of
Rejuvination,“ where I was the only male I ever saw being granted
the neighbor-status as I call it, of being welcome to hang out at the
kitchen table of certain said bordellos and yack with the ladies,
proprietess included, whether there was necessarily bed-business or
not sometimes.
My eye for erotic is a wide-lens
camera: I never compare two women ever, and I never judge – I not
only accept “flaws,“ I cherish them, that's sometimes where the
erotic component even is, which is why so many guys miss it – it
requires a mature eye which most altogether lack because they've
bought into the bland dick-tates of cultural status quo and
commercial marketing. I rejoice in bodily hair wherever it is, au
naturelle, and if a woman is herself more cmofortable without, that's
alright. There is not a bodily orifice on a woman I avoid, either in
massage or in tongue-play or cock-ulation, not a single one. Firmly
but gently, with timing everything is possible – and passionately
in-joyed. Nature has given us so and so many digits and so and so
many orifices, who needs toys – or to borrow from Monty Python,
acoutrements. I love mouths, lips, breasts, nipples, vaginas, butts,
anuses, thighs, I absolutely relish armpits, I tend away from
too-slender twd. a robuster fleshy, a healthy amount of it, I don't
consider any woman “overweight“ until she acutally is. I'm not
telling this to be vulgar, it's just a matter of fact and
openness, I don't intend to get graphic here. To recall from an
earlier passage:
…The wild erotic energy radiating from its female form is
full-fleshed, generously-haired, musky and mature, and not without
subtlety.
By full-fleshed is merely meant, that the entire span of her corporeal body communicates a hearty welcome to life-radiance at the erotic level.
By generously-haired is meant, she is not bound to male dictates of artificial beauty.
By musky and mature are meant, her own-scented fragrance and earthy experience are her jewels and likewise independent of controlling-male notions toward hygienically sterile bodies robbed of their history and wild heritage.
By subtle is meant, even if the personality were somewhat crude or asleep, the energy is certainly awake, and for those who will encounter and acknowledge it with an attitude of respect and meet it with the proper degree of energy, it is as benevolent as it is wild. …
By full-fleshed is merely meant, that the entire span of her corporeal body communicates a hearty welcome to life-radiance at the erotic level.
By generously-haired is meant, she is not bound to male dictates of artificial beauty.
By musky and mature are meant, her own-scented fragrance and earthy experience are her jewels and likewise independent of controlling-male notions toward hygienically sterile bodies robbed of their history and wild heritage.
By subtle is meant, even if the personality were somewhat crude or asleep, the energy is certainly awake, and for those who will encounter and acknowledge it with an attitude of respect and meet it with the proper degree of energy, it is as benevolent as it is wild. …
And now I'll finally cut to the chase. An
American woman looked me up while here on business, end of summer
'94 Berlin, she got a full, good massage. She was by all accounts,
in her sweats and bike and glasses, “not a looker,“ yet when
she'd disrobed and received the massage, not only was I storngly
aroused by her splendid erotic beauty, I felt it in the air so thick
you could cut it with a knife. Still I exercised caution. She was
leaving town that day to do a 6-week stint in the new-East Europe as
she was with a major news network based in Atlanta, I won't name
names though. We hugged and agreed on a massage when she swings back
through. I left a message on her recorder explaining my impressions,
offering the full monty if she should so wish, and if not then the
best massage and we'd leave it at that. On returning she told me
she'd played my message back six times, so she got a massage and we
spent one long splendifulous night together, followed by a very very
hot correspondence until gentle and loving closure – remember,
there was no internet back then, you licked stamps with that same
tongue you...never mind.
Now here's the kicker: As good as my
hunches are, this one went right under my radar. We went up to her
borrowed flat that second encounter, and we kissed. I noticed she
was a bit unhandy and it didn't matter, it was endearing. When she
told me she'd been out of practice for a long time, I only figured she
meant at all, but she meant with men – then she explained she's
lesbian and in a relationship with her partner back home going on 15
years. I laughed so hard from the belly, I had to explain that the
laugh was on me, one because that had not even occurred to me
although it ought to have, and two because I could now really be the
proverbial “lesbian in a male body.“ She had been harboring a
growing need for the whole past year to feel a man in her again. We
not only loved and in-joyed one another deeply, erotically,
passionately. She said this had healed a wound in her she'd carried
since age 16 – I understood immediately without any elaborations.
A lot of women could relate. I later encouraged her to remain as
lesbian as she wants, whatever came of her partnership, but that she
also could know herself now as bi-sexual, and that this was also
wonderful. What matters is only to know and to cop to it. I've met
lots of lesbians in dail life and the ones I've always really
appreciated are the butch-cut ladies who are so fucking cool and
mature (usually over a certain age) and self-confident and
male-friendly-while-needing-none.
So there it is. By the way,
before I clothes – sorry, close – anybody know the one about the
old wrangler sitting in a bar having his beer, and an attractive
woman takes the stool next to him, has her drink in hand and asks him
sort of off the cuff, “So, are you a real cowboy?“ To which he
replies, wrangler-like, “Well, I get up mornings early, go out to
the horses, tend to them, drive cattle out, brand calves, repair
fences, pick up feed and supplies from town,“ etc. etc. - “...yeah,
I guess you could say I'm a real cowboy.“ She replies, “Well I'm
a lesbian. When I get up mornings I think about women, when I shower
and have breakfast I think about women, when I go to work and go
through my day I think about women, when I come home and watch TV or
read or have dinner I think about women, right up until I go to
sleep, I just think about women women women.“ Then she sets down
her drink and they part witha mutual nod. He sits there and stares
forward, until a nice frinedly middle-aged couple from out of town
join him at the bar. “Saayy, are you a real cowboy?“ the husband
inquires. The cowboy takes another swallow and considers for a
moment, replying reflectively, “Well, up to now I thought I was,
but now I reckon I'm a lesbian.“
Much of my poetry reflects what I've
written here:
You there, with that nose of yours,
that longish, elegantly erotic nose you hate;
you with your 'not quite symmetrical' face, don't you know:
that very jawline which shames you delights me?
Quit feeling 'fat' - define your standard, who told you that?
Stop chasing warts, leave them;
if your body-tatoos can be so alluring, why can't a mole?
Are your breasts still 'inadequate' - or overmuch . . . but
look at your thighs, what form they give you!
Think of Aphrodite, not Claudia or Naomi! Erotic, not neurotic!
Go neither obese, nor half-starved to please; shave nothing, smell enticing!
Stop cursing your buttocks, think classic, not anorexic!
Breathe in your own inner aroma, let it wend its way in and out unimpeded,
brightening your woman-face, your sensual sensuous body, restoring health -
or haven't you suffered enough sickness over false self-image?
When you speak against your own beauty, when you deny it,
you speak against me, you deny me - for I,
I am full of your beauty, and cannot get enough of it.
that longish, elegantly erotic nose you hate;
you with your 'not quite symmetrical' face, don't you know:
that very jawline which shames you delights me?
Quit feeling 'fat' - define your standard, who told you that?
Stop chasing warts, leave them;
if your body-tatoos can be so alluring, why can't a mole?
Are your breasts still 'inadequate' - or overmuch . . . but
look at your thighs, what form they give you!
Think of Aphrodite, not Claudia or Naomi! Erotic, not neurotic!
Go neither obese, nor half-starved to please; shave nothing, smell enticing!
Stop cursing your buttocks, think classic, not anorexic!
Breathe in your own inner aroma, let it wend its way in and out unimpeded,
brightening your woman-face, your sensual sensuous body, restoring health -
or haven't you suffered enough sickness over false self-image?
When you speak against your own beauty, when you deny it,
you speak against me, you deny me - for I,
I am full of your beauty, and cannot get enough of it.
Come-Union, or: On Be-Coming
(not for
minors, please show a current ID at the door)
Tongue and
lingam should work together,
tongue must lead
and lingam follow, always in tandem,
attaining a
rhythm most naturally arrived at and held
through wakeful
concentration and passion of interest.
And age is no
matter, let us
dispense with
that right now;
where erotic
knowledge is concerned
youth and
advanced experience meet well.
And a wizard or
crone might bring
more energy and
maturity to bear,
having long
struck down the conditioned inhibition,
and unlocked
beauty overlooked by puerile dictates.
Tongue and
lingam should work together;
tongue and lips,
stroking and caressing,
flattering,
fluttering, probing, preparing,
arousing
moisture and goose bumps, bringing flavor.
Entering all the
same places, received with wild care,
creative passion
always considering you, beloved,
where timing and
spontaneity are taken to an art
through
intuition or matured instinct.
Tongue tip on
tongue, on lips, on neck and throat,
tongue washing
armpits, over bitten shoulders,
teasing raised
nipples with crazy circling,
tongue over
belly, navel, thighs and clit.
Yoni and mouth
yielding to swooning but untiring kiss
as tongue sweeps
and caresses without care,
the taste of you
and your luxurient hair,
your
perspiration mingled with rose oil and juices.
Small of back
massaged with hand and with tongue,
so the buttocks,
kneaded; so also between, where cleft and anus
are stimulated
in a manner known since ages
and still
indescribable.
Coming in your
mouth, lingam gliding over your tongue,
I feel myself
entering your very bloodstream,
charging every
cell in your entire body.
That is just one
variation of course.
Gliding lingam
on your neck, over your armpits,
between your
breasts, against your nipples, across your belly,
along your
thighs – and coming anywhere there,
is well spent .
. . but spent.
Coming in your
yoni via whichever of so many positions,
your
gratification is central to my interest,
for by
abandoning the central interest in mine,
my own climax is
assured merely by being in you, serving yours.
But for all
that, I find coming in your ass to be
the
gratification par excellence for both,
bringing forth
unimagined fruit, once discovered
never to be
forgotten nor forsaken.
I will tell you
why I know this.
Deep as the yoni
well is, there is something
primally deeper
still, in a different and healing way,
about entering
that ass gradually with lingam.
The ass is
charged with a negative and a postitive
association
both, a crossing of pleasure and pain,
reward and
punishment, expectation and relief,
tension and
gratification, erotic and banal.
Negatively seen,
the brutality of a sadist finds
in this the very
place to ravage and humiliate,
to abuse and
fuck to death your very soul
in that place of
your most basic security.
Positively seen,
lovingly and consentually entered,
there is deeply
erotic, healing, validating union
in a place so
deep in the psyche as to defy words.
http://titsandsass.com/the-erasure-of-maya-angelou/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)