Germany, the AfD, and Security

In the new post-election Bundestag (90 seats occupied by the Alternative for Deutschland - AfD) all the established sitting parties sent their respective representatives to join the Federal Committee for Overseeing of all branches and agencies of the secret service (military and civilian). All parties are, according to law, participants on this Committee. It would stand to reason, that would include the AfD. After all, their candidate, Dr. Reusch, is an Attorney General, formerly of the CDU. If you wanted someone on this Committee with more integrity and competence than the entire lot of them (I'll come back to that in a second), and more character, more experience to bring to bear - Reusch would be your man, and the AfD would be the party to deliver that.

But they shut the AfD entirely out - which is illegal, is unconstitutional, but that's nothing new any more. ("Badges? We don' need no stinkin' badges!") No AfD, no Attorney General Dr. Reusch on a Committee of such import.

Well...WHY on earth would they do that? Trust me on this one: the AfD is the one and only party - and the only oppositional one at all - which, when it comes to work it goes to work; when they show up, which unlike the other parties they do in full, they are ready to go at it. They have set a record in the very short time they've been in the Federal Bundestag, for how many problems they have directly taken on and addressed, and outspokenly given solutions for, they have tabled more drafts and ideas than anyone else, because they mean business, they mean to bring Germany out of the dreck of Merkel's Dark Age. No one is perfect, but the AfD is THE Red-Pill which Germany desperately needs, it has its integrity and that is its best credential - okay, that and the fact that it has the most widely competent, highest educated and most politically experienced members, culled largely from the other parties which they'd left for AfD.

Now: what would a guy like AfD's Attorney General Dr. Reusch actually do on such a Committee, why would his presence there present such a "threat" and to whom? Well for one, he would uncover and expose everything which the various branches and agencies of Merkel's secret services have been doing for the past 12+ years - courting and grooming terrorism, shredding or "losing" vital documents of evidence, covering trails, inviting Islamisation, tending to Merkel's Gaslighting...stuff like that. And he would uncover and expose their past offenses of commission and omission, their present offenses of the same, and their future plans for more of it. "Can't have that, can we?"

And who, among those long established, long sitting parties HAVE their representatives on this extremely vital and sensitive Committee overseeing all matters of secret services?...

The Greens have their "man" on it, Stroebele, a former lawyer for the terrorist Red Army Faction (RAF). The party of The Left, which is the direct successor to the East German Stasi-SED, have their girl on there. And so forth and so on.

But an Attorney General? Nooo, not from the AfD, which alone among all parties speaks for direct democracy as an integral part of their platform. Because: the AfD are "Nazis". (What alone makes them "that", is merely that they aren't Communists. They are the only liberal-conservatives and the only opposition worthy of the name.)

But where a door is shut, windows open. And I feel sometimes more and more convinced, that God has not forsaken Germany. I'd stake my life on that.

Have the Germans deserved better (aside from the AfD voters)? No. But God is Merciful. Evidently.