How do you propose to pursue a
discussion
with someone who's identifying
– much or little,
with a nearly three billion
population of believers
in a 14 centuries-old doctrine
which proposes
that you are kuffar
and thus unworthy; or dhimmi,
and therefore second-class and
taxable for it –
unless you should decide to
forgo and identify as well?
How do you propose to approach
a discussion
with one who either
perpetrates, aids, or abets
the practice and
implementation of unspeakable abuses
on an unspeakable level at an
unspeakable frequency,
with an ever double-sided
habit of speaking, whose
stated agenda is to make you
and the world bend to its image
or else bow to its
all-encompassing domination?
How do you propose to begin a
discussion
with those who demand your "tolerance" but have none themselves,
who mis-use the multi-culture
you already had and press it into mono-,
who will not conform to the
modern jurisdiction of lands they've entered
but demand you and every land
conform to the archaic court of the bedouin;
who shun the clothing you wear
and the meat you eat while demanding
that you break your neck to
suit the design of their environment?
How do you discuss coexistence
with one who is not only
incompatible with but entirely
against the very notion of democracy,
who withdraws his hand from
any Western female encountered in greeting,
or who withdraws herself
behind her niqab
and insists
it's her choice and right,
who hold Jews to be apes,
Christians to be pigs, Hindus to be worse,
gays to be less,
and generally despises animals
and nature anyway – emphatically insisting
that this is about a religion
of peace, asserting this argument most aggressively?
No comments:
Post a Comment